[Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?

2009-07-09 Thread Duncan
Ron Johnson posted 4a561f52.1090...@cox.net, excerpted below, on Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:48:18 -0500: > After reading this: >http://www.westnet.com/~gsmith/content/linux-pdflush.htm > > and especially this thread: > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/7/303 > > I boosted dirty_ratio from 10 to 30 and

Re: [Pan-users] Re: a little something for the pan heads

2009-07-09 Thread CSV4ME2
On Thursday 09 July 2009, CSV4ME2 wrote: > On Thursday 09 July 2009, walt wrote: > > On 07/08/2009 04:16 PM, CSV4ME2 wrote: > > > On Monday 22 June 2009, lost-co...@zianet.com wrote: > > >> Since I was bored and needed to learn git I decided to apply some of > > >> the pending patches to pan and pu

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?

2009-07-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On 2009-07-09 10:53, Duncan wrote: Ron Johnson posted 4a55ef94.5010...@cox.net, excerpted below, on Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:24:36 -0500: It seems to me that's more likely to cause huge issues than the comparatively small 1/3 gig tasks.nzb file that you've been complaining about, particularly sinc

[Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?

2009-07-09 Thread Duncan
Ron Johnson posted 4a55ef94.5010...@cox.net, excerpted below, on Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:24:36 -0500: >> It seems to me that's more likely to cause huge issues than the >> comparatively small 1/3 gig tasks.nzb file that you've been complaining >> about, particularly since the kernel should be cachin

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?

2009-07-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On 2009-07-09 03:59, Duncan wrote: Ron Johnson posted 4a558d7b.5010...@cox.net, excerpted below, on Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:26:03 -0500: Of course, that assumes it's not a simple permissions issue... Nope. $ dir alt.binaries.dvdr* -rw--- 1 me me 3658599777 2009-07-02 03:37:45 alt.binaries.d

ls and alias (was Re: [Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?)

2009-07-09 Thread Ron Johnson
On 2009-07-09 03:05, Duncan wrote: Ron Johnson posted 4a558d7b.5010...@cox.net, excerpted below, on Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:26:03 -0500: $ dir total 427104 drwxr-xr-x 4 me me 4096 2009-07-09 01:25:21 ./ drwxr-xr-x 204 me me 36864 2009-07-09 01:25:03 ../ -rw--- 1 me me 6797

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Win32 build/installer of GIT updates

2009-07-09 Thread Steve Davies
2009/7/9 walt : > On 07/08/2009 02:10 PM, Steve Davies wrote: >> >> I am just in the process of uploading a new build/installer package >> based on the GIT snapshot from 07/Jul/2009. >> >> It is in the usual place http://paninstall.googlepages.com/ until >> Google migrate it elsewhere. >> >> Let me

Re: [Pan-users] Re: a little something for the pan heads

2009-07-09 Thread CSV4ME2
On Thursday 09 July 2009, walt wrote: > On 07/08/2009 04:16 PM, CSV4ME2 wrote: > > On Monday 22 June 2009, lost-co...@zianet.com wrote: > >> Since I was bored and needed to learn git I decided to apply some of the > >> pending patches to pan and put up a repo for it. So here you go. > >> > >> git:

[Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?

2009-07-09 Thread Duncan
Ron Johnson posted 4a558d7b.5010...@cox.net, excerpted below, on Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:26:03 -0500: >> Of course, that assumes it's not a simple permissions issue... > > Nope. > > $ dir alt.binaries.dvdr* > -rw--- 1 me me 3658599777 2009-07-02 03:37:45 alt.binaries.dvdr Just that isolated f

[Pan-users] Re: Forcing an expire?

2009-07-09 Thread Duncan
Ron Johnson posted 4a558d7b.5010...@cox.net, excerpted below, on Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:26:03 -0500: > $ dir > total 427104 > drwxr-xr-x 4 me me 4096 2009-07-09 01:25:21 ./ > drwxr-xr-x 204 me me 36864 2009-07-09 01:25:03 ../ > -rw--- 1 me me 6797 2009-07-09 01:11:47 accels.t