On 2009-07-03 22:15, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 12:56:36 pm Ron Johnson wrote:
Also (and maybe because I'm a DBA), this problem just *screams* for
SQLite and a database in the "First Normal Form".
Please no. SQLite has problems with NFS. It's not so much that SQLite
won't work
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 01:15:24 pm Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 12:56:36 pm Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Also (and maybe because I'm a DBA), this problem just *screams* for
> > SQLite and a database in the "First Normal Form".
>
> Please no. SQLite has problems with NFS. It's not so much that
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 12:56:36 pm Ron Johnson wrote:
> Also (and maybe because I'm a DBA), this problem just *screams* for
> SQLite and a database in the "First Normal Form".
Please no. SQLite has problems with NFS. It's not so much that SQLite
won't work on NFS as that when (not if) something brea
On 2009-07-02 18:53, Duncan wrote:
Ron Johnson posted
4a4cf8fc.8030...@cox.net, excerpted below, on Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:14:20
-0500:
Because giganews has such a long retention period, some groups can have
a very *large number* of messages. If you subscribe to two or more of
them, you could r
K. Haley, Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:15:55 -0600:
> I think I finally got all the gmime changes done. There was a change in
> the behavior of g_mime_message_foreach that caused pan to make two
> passes through multipart messages.
>
> git://github.com/lostcoder/pan2.git
Today's pull from git is packaged
On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 14:47:51 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
Hello Duncan,
> dialup) pipes were rather less common back then, so I'm sure things
> have changed a bit since then.
The one thing that never changes is that things keep changing. :-)
--
Regards _
/ )
Ron Johnson posted
4a4e104e.2050...@cox.net, excerpted below, on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:06:06
-0500:
> Even in the closed-source world, there can be lots of "sub-minor"
> versions out there, especially for stuff like Oracle, which releases
> security upgrades on a regular basis, not to mention supp
On 2009-07-03 08:49, Duncan wrote:
[snip]
The proprietaryware world is of course rather different, since there's
generally only a very limited few bit-unique binary versions out there,
often only one for a particular product version, and it's thus much
simpler to provide binary patches for th
"Travis" posted
b70405489165462e93c107e362bc1...@travispc, excerpted below, on Thu, 02
Jul 2009 23:50:40 -0700:
> I also saw that the folk that provide the Windows version of Pan said
> he/she/they were going to add it, sometime.
>
> So I take it the patch can't just be applied to Pan?
Yes, th
On 2009-07-03 01:50, Travis wrote:
[snip]
So I take it the patch can't just be applied to Pan?
That would mean "patching the binary". It's *possible*, if you have
the proper tool, and would certainly save bandwidth, but it's only
workable against one exact version of the original binary.
10 matches
Mail list logo
