[Pan-users] Re: Pan not emailing me

2009-03-03 Thread David Shochat
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:56:29 +, Beartooth wrote: > On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:40:18 -0600, Gerald L wrote: > >> According to the others "Terminal" or "terminal" is probably the >> right >> command -- but since alpine includes arguments you'll probably need to >> quote it. >> >> Terminal -e '

[Pan-users] alpine test

2009-03-03 Thread David Shochat
This is a test of mailing through alpine. ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users

[Pan-users] Re: Pan not emailing me

2009-03-03 Thread Beartooth
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:40:18 -0600, Gerald L wrote: > According to the others "Terminal" or "terminal" is probably the right > command -- but since alpine includes arguments you'll probably need to > quote it. > > Terminal -e 'alpine -url %s' > > or, if %s is pre-expanded by Pan > > Terminal

[Pan-users] Re: Pan not emailing me

2009-03-03 Thread Beartooth
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:43:32 +, David Shochat wrote: > You have to figure out the name of the executable. It is probably /not/ > "Terminal"; that's the package name, although I admit that in my Ubuntu > situation, the package name and the executable name happened to be the > same. But in gener

[Pan-users] Re: Pan not emailing me

2009-03-03 Thread Duncan
David Shochat posted goit9k$jt...@ger.gmane.org, excerpted below, on Tue, 03 Mar 2009 09:29:24 +: > And I have a basic question: How is the new message supposed to get the > subject and body of the post? I can only see how it would get the > recipient from the url argument. I think Duncan ha

[Pan-users] Re: Pan not emailing me

2009-03-03 Thread David Shochat
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:01:56 -0500, Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote: > David Shochat wrote: >> You have to figure out the name of the executable. It is probably /not/ >> "Terminal"; that's the package name, although I admit that in my Ubuntu >> situation, the package name and the executable name happene