Beartooth wrote:
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:36:03 +0300, Роман Донченко wrote:
[...]
The Fedora package for it is called simply "Terminal".
Aha! I didn't have, per rpm -q; yum got it; and it runs all right.
Since I can't use Gnome Preferences till that's fixed; I went
into Pan's
David Shochat wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:31:45 +, Beartooth wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:36:03 +0300, Роман Донченко wrote:
>> [...]
>>> The Fedora package for it is called simply "Terminal".
>>
>> Aha! I didn't have, per rpm -q; yum got it; and it runs all right.
>>
>>
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:31:45 +, Beartooth wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:36:03 +0300, Роман Донченко wrote:
> [...]
>> The Fedora package for it is called simply "Terminal".
>
> Aha! I didn't have, per rpm -q; yum got it; and it runs all right.
>
> Since I can't use Gnome
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:36:03 +0300, Роман Донченко wrote:
[...]
> The Fedora package for it is called simply "Terminal".
Aha! I didn't have, per rpm -q; yum got it; and it runs all right.
Since I can't use Gnome Preferences till that's fixed; I went
into Pan's, set that t
Beartooth писал в своём письме
Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:48:55 +0300:
[r...@hbsk2 .pan2]# yum install xfce4-terminal
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
Setting up Install Process
Parsing package install arguments
No package xfce4-terminal available.
Nothing to do
[r...@hbsk2 .pan2]
So it's
Beartooth wrote:
One of the people on VTLUUG is singing the praises of an app
called simply screen; I suspect, looking at the config file before I even
read his stuff, that it's pretty well over my head; but he's right about
one thing -- it's already installed in my distro (Fedora 10). Whadda
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:44:53 +, David Shochat wrote:
>>> ... That's why I'm
>>> thinking you'd be happier with one of the newer terms. -- David
>>
>> I've been meaning to try a bunch; I even have an icon on a panel
>> on one of these machines that gives me a list of them ... You know how
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:17:05 +1000, Lin wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Tony Sivori wrote:
>> On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:41:49 +1000, Lin wrote:
>> >
>> > %BOS
>> > [^*$]
>> > Score:: =-
>> > %Xref: (.*,){3}
>> > Newsgroups: (.*,){3,}
>>
>> What would this filter do? Kill anything cross posted to 3 o
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 23:10:18 -0500, psistormyamato-N9AOi2cAC9ZBDgjK7y7TUQ
wrote:
> Instead of filtering out potentially legitimate posters, why not just
> switch to a news server that does a better job of handling the spam for
> you? I have been using Motzarella, which is free, for a while now, an
Daniel Rahn posted
200903020948.20264.daniel.r...@novell.com, excerpted below, on Mon, 02
Mar 2009 09:48:19 +0100:
> GCC 4.4 again requires some minor changes to pan.
Thanks. I'm sure I'll be running into the issue here and needing to work
around it shortly, and knowing where the patch is /be
On Mon, 2 Mar 2009, Tony Sivori wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:41:49 +1000, Lin wrote:
> > Below is my score for Xref posts now for all groups. I am using .133
> > but I'm sure I had to change it to Newsgroups before then for it to be
> > recognised and to work. Maybe this will work as well for
Hi,
GCC 4.4 again requires some minor changes to pan.
Patch attached.
-Daniel
Index: pan/general/log.cc
===
--- pan/general/log.cc.orig 2007-08-01 19:00:01.0 +0200
+++ pan/general/log.cc 2009-02-27 23:24:38.0 +0100
12 matches
Mail list logo
