On Wed 08 Oct 2008 at 08:20:55 -0500, David Kelly wrote:
> FreeBSD has in addition to the native FreeBSD native API, an optional
> Linux API to allow use of unmodified Linux binaries. Portions of Linux
> code are lifted from Linux to implement this optional kernel module.
That is most definitely n
"CSV4ME2" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> сообщил/сообщила
в новостях следующее: news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, no, Stallman's kernel was named Herd, as in GNU/Herd
Hurd. And it still is, though progressing very slowly.
--
Manually typed signature.
___
Pan-use
On 10/08/2008 Yavor Doganov wrote:
But there are other, non-technical reasons to say "GNU/Linux", and
over
the years I've figured out that the most vocal opponents of the name
are
people who are shy to make associations with GNU, mostly because they
avoid talking about software freedom.
Wel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 0.14.2 is more than five years old at this point. I'd strongly recommend
> using 0.133 instead.
> If you're intent on getting 0.14.2 to build, for whatever reason, send along
> output from "gcc -v"
> Older versions of gcc (such as those in use when 0.14.2 was release)
A few weeks earlier I posted:
> A few days ago I posted a message that pan did not show the messages
> it had collected from the server. I got a message from Duncan that the
> error probably was caused by an old ~/.pan directory. So - as he
> suggested - I created a new .pan2 directory, and everyt
No, no, Stallman's kernel was named Herd, as in GNU/Herd, that never took off
and luckily for us Linus appeared, undaunted by any and all professors with
established names, such as Andy Tanenbaum (minix:remember that famous mail?)
As a man with a mission and a vision Stalllman must be pissed off
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 08:13:27AM +, Yavor Doganov wrote:
>
> > How can it be the same system if it is running a different kernel? Are
> > you saying that there is no difference between the Linux kernel and the
> > FreeBSD kernel?
>
> It is a different system, but all those packages work wit
Yavor Doganov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 08 Oct 2008
08:13:27 +:
> But there are other, non-technical reasons to say "GNU/Linux", and over
> the years I've figured out that the most vocal opponents of the name are
> people who are shy to make associ
David Kelly:
I quit trying to use Linux back in the Slackware days. Was too unstable.
One still had to collect patchkits from various places to make it run
properly, and then patches often conflicted and nothing ran properly.
After crashes trashed my filesystem the 3rd time in one week requir
В Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:17:13 +1000, Steven D'Aprano написа:
> I have read it. I think its sad that you assume that just because I
> don't agree with the GNU opinion that implies I don't know what the GNU
> arguments are.
No, not really. I assume that everyone who is familiar with the history
of
10 matches
Mail list logo
