[Pan-users] Re: Two NNTP servers?

2008-09-28 Thread Duncan
"Dan Stromberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 28 Sep 2008 16:34:06 -0700: > If I have two NNTP servers, NNTP1 and NNTP2, and there are newsgroups G1 > and G2 that appear on BOTH NNTP1 and NNTP2 - and further, I want to see > G1 on NTTP1 and G2 on NNTP2 - i

[Pan-users] Two NNTP servers?

2008-09-28 Thread Dan Stromberg
If I have two NNTP servers, NNTP1 and NNTP2, and there are newsgroups G1 and G2 that appear on BOTH NNTP1 and NNTP2 - and further, I want to see G1 on NTTP1 and G2 on NNTP2 - is there a way of doing this with current versions of pan? I'm not sure, but it seems like in current versions of pan you l

[Pan-users] Re: [Pan 0.133-Windows] Drops server

2008-09-28 Thread Duncan
walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:17:06 +: > It was easy to eliminate the extra newline above the sig, but I notice > now that pan leaves too many blank line above my reply, at least for my > personal taste. The sig "standard" says das

Re: [Pan-users] Re: [Pan 0.133-Windows] Drops server

2008-09-28 Thread Kurt Schilling
walt wrote: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:47:01 -0400, Kurt Schilling wrote: > >> Filed bug report with Bugzilla. >> >> Bug 554178 – extra carriage returns above sig: this is in Pan >> 0-120-0.133 > > > > It was easy to eliminate the extra newline above the sig, but I notice > now that pan leaves to

[Pan-users] Re: Threading problem

2008-09-28 Thread Beartooth
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 21:50:56 +, walt wrote: > On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:57:51 +, Beartooth wrote: > >> Somebody please take a glance at gmane.comp.emulators.wine.user, >> particularly at two threads started by me on Sunday the 21st and >> Wednesday the 24th of this month. Every new repl

[Pan-users] Re: [Pan 0.133-Windows] Drops server

2008-09-28 Thread walt
On Sun, 28 Sep 2008 09:47:01 -0400, Kurt Schilling wrote: > Filed bug report with Bugzilla. > > Bug 554178 – extra carriage returns above sig: this is in Pan > 0-120-0.133 It was easy to eliminate the extra newline above the sig, but I notice now that pan leaves too many blank line above my re

Re: [Pan-users] Raiden's Realm: Pan review

2008-09-28 Thread Rick Barry
Thanks for the tip. I wasn't aware of that site and it looks mighty useful. Excellent review and nicely written follow up as well. ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users

Re: [Pan-users] Raiden's Realm: Pan review

2008-09-28 Thread Kurt Schilling
Duncan wrote: > Raiden's Realm[1] has a review of pan up. Steve was using the now > somewhat dated 0.129, and missed the task list (apparently expecting to > see it as another tab/pane rather than a separate dialog window), so > complained about missing a queue list, but other than that, it was

Re: [Pan-users] Re: [Pan 0.133-Windows] Drops server

2008-09-28 Thread Kurt Schilling
Kurt Schilling wrote: > Duncan wrote: >> Kurt Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 27 Sep >> 2008 08:26:03 -0400: >> > You could play around with the various sig type options. It has been > awhile since I tried that and I only tried the two t

[Pan-users] Raiden's Realm: Pan review

2008-09-28 Thread Duncan
Raiden's Realm[1] has a review of pan up. Steve was using the now somewhat dated 0.129, and missed the task list (apparently expecting to see it as another tab/pane rather than a separate dialog window), so complained about missing a queue list, but other than that, it was a generally accurate