walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 05 Aug 2008 02:43:59
+:
> Ah! What you want is a highly-threaded newsreader. Pan2 isn't there
> yet, and don't hold your breath. I believe I read a post from Duncan
> saying that legacy pan is multi-threaded, but I
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 01:27:14 +, Greg Lee wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:35:51 +, walt wrote:
>
>> I'm sure you are exactly right, but just what is that busy computation?
>
> Who cares? That's not where the bug is. The bug is that I can't go
> ahead and use pan for doing things which d
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:35:51 +, walt wrote:
> I'm sure you are exactly right, but just what is that busy computation?
Who cares? That's not where the bug is. The bug is that I can't go
ahead and use pan for doing things which don't depend on the results
of the computation.
--
Greg
On Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:03:33 +, Greg Lee wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:58:21 +, walt wrote:
>
>> ... Because pan is stuck in a loop somewhere, ...
>
> In my opinion, you guys are spinning your wheels. Because pan is not
> stuck (if I'm talking about the same bug as you are); it's jus
On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:58:21 +, walt wrote:
> ... Because pan is stuck in a loop somewhere, ...
In my opinion, you guys are spinning your wheels. Because pan
is not stuck (if I'm talking about the same bug as you are);
it's just taking a long time. And there is nothing abnormal
about it ta
On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:46:00 +, Matthijs Benschop wrote:
> Op Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:40:40 +, schreef walt:
>>
>> Just occurred to me that I don't use any filters, so the 'apply_filter'
>> step in my case would be a null_op. What about you (and David)?
>
> No filters enabled here (unless t
Matthijs Benschop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 04 Aug 2008
20:46:00 +:
> Op Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:40:40 +, schreef walt:
>>
>> Just occurred to me that I don't use any filters, so the 'apply_filter'
>> step in my case would be a null_op. What abou
walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:40:40
+:
> Just occurred to me that I don't use any filters, so the 'apply_filter'
> step in my case would be a null_op. What about you (and David)?
Without checking the code I suspect this isn't what
Op Mon, 04 Aug 2008 19:40:40 +, schreef walt:
>
> Just occurred to me that I don't use any filters, so the 'apply_filter'
> step in my case would be a null_op. What about you (and David)?
No filters enabled here (unless they're configured somewhere I dont know)
Btw, I verified running my sa
On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:32:34 +, Matthijs Benschop wrote:
> Op Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:07:34 +, schreef walt:
>
>
>> Have you tried strace during the long pause? If you start pan in gdb
>> and hit Ctrl-C during the busy time you can type 'bt' to see what part
>> of the code is running at tha
Op Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:07:34 +, schreef walt:
> Have you tried strace during the long pause? If you start pan in gdb
> and hit Ctrl-C during the busy time you can type 'bt' to see what part
> of the code is running at that point. You need debugging symbols for
> that, though. Charles uses
On Sun, 03 Aug 2008 14:10:54 -0400, David Shochat wrote:
> ...All I can think of now is gcc version. There was a post from
> Matthijs Benschop on 8/2 that also suggested gcc. Here are the gcc
> versions:
>
> Ubuntu 8.04:
> gcc version 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)
>
> Mac OS X 10.5.4:
> gcc vers
David Shochat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 03 Aug 2008
14:10:54 -0400:
> I upgraded gtk2 (and various other things) on my Mac via "port upgrade
> installed" and that gave me gtk2 2.12.9, same as on my Ubuntu system.
Also note that you're comparing differ
13 matches
Mail list logo
