On Thu, 29 May 2008 22:56:12 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> A few days after opening the bug, it was consolidated with four other
> reports. Examining the various comments, I learned that it only happens
> if Pan has to word-wrap the signature. AHA! The first part of my sig,
> the part that doesn't c
- Original Message
> From: Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: pan-users@nongnu.org
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 9:25:35 AM
> Subject: [Pan-users] Re: Compiling and running pan on OS X Leopard
>
> Hopefully someone better informed can add to this, as I don't do Mac (or
> indeed, slaveryware
On Fri, 30 May 2008 06:41:16 +, Duncan wrote:
> Joe Zeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu,
> 29 May 2008 22:56:12 -0700:
>
>> Thought you'd all like to know, in case somebody else has the same
>> problem.
>
> Wow, that explains why I never saw it... I
Jeff Berman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 30
May 2008 00:48:15 -0700:
> Hi, this may be sort of a dumb question, but is it possible and/or
> feasible to run pan on Mac OS X 10.5 without using Fink or MacPorts?
> I've traditionally used Fink under 10.4 to
Hi, this may be sort of a dumb question, but is it possible and/or feasible to
run pan on Mac OS X 10.5 without using Fink or MacPorts? I've traditionally
used Fink under 10.4 to install gtk, etc., but I just got a new Mac with
Leopard and I'm setting it up now. If, as Apple states, OS X is a
