On Monday 07 April 2008 20:40:54 Duncan wrote:
> I've sent him back a version to test on systems he has there, that if
> I'm correct, is the minimal include for at least 2.12 thru 2.16, and
> probably from 2.4 or 2.6.
I have tested the version I posted some minutes ago down to SuSE Linux
9.3, i
Daniel Rahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 08
Apr 2008 07:43:33 +0200:
> Give the attached patch a try.
Thanks, Dan. I was getting ready to post it but you beat me to it.
Altho I've submitted a few patches before, I believe this is the first
time I've
On Tuesday 08 April 2008 01:03:19 CSV4ME2 wrote:
> i'm running 2.10.13 and willing to give it a try.
> what do i need to do ?
> a svn checkout of some sort or .. ?
Give the attached patch a try.
Duncan and me are in slight disagreement on the conditionals here.
The attached patch removed the cond
On Monday 07 April 2008, Duncan wrote:
> Since the other thread had migrated from its original gcc 4.3 title, I
> decided to start a new one here.
>
> Dan and I are making progress. We finally have a version that works for
> both him (on OpenSuSE systems with glib 2.12 thru 2.16) and I (with now
>
Since the other thread had migrated from its original gcc 4.3 title, I
decided to start a new one here.
Dan and I are making progress. We finally have a version that works for
both him (on OpenSuSE systems with glib 2.12 thru 2.16) and I (with now
2.16.2). The problem was one header file (gli
