Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?

2008-03-30 Thread Daniel Rahn
On Sunday 30 March 2008 14:31:15 Beso wrote: > other distros have usually precompiled binaries, and thus with known > glib version, so once the problem is identified and known i don't > think that should be difficult for them to prebuild the right stuff. > also, their installers usually just instal

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?

2008-03-30 Thread Daniel Rahn
On Sunday 30 March 2008 16:17:43 Duncan wrote: > Note that I'm normally building (and therefore patching against) > live-svn (which has been revision 335 thru all of this, no updates), > but I tried 0.132 here too, just to be sure. Same errors. The patch > applies fine but the compile fails with

[Pan-users] unsubscribe

2008-03-30 Thread Bill Wright
Please remove me from this list ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users

[Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?

2008-03-30 Thread Duncan
Daniel Rahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:36:36 +0200: > PS: So I assume you did not try the patch so far ;) I hadn't. I just did (using the patch as attached) and got failure. Note that I'm normally building (and therefore patching again

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?

2008-03-30 Thread Beso
2008/3/30, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Beso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted > [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted > below, on Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:04:23 +: > > > > well this wouldn't be difficult to fix in gentoo since the ebuild could > > see what version is installed and apply a patch for fixing the

[Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?

2008-03-30 Thread Duncan
Beso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:04:23 +: > well this wouldn't be difficult to fix in gentoo since the ebuild could > see what version is installed and apply a patch for fixing the includes > based on the installed version of glib. the

[Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?

2008-03-30 Thread Keith Richie
On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 11:04:23 +, Beso wrote: > 2008/3/30, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted >> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 29 Mar 2008 >> 15:40:39 -0700: >> >> >> > In this particular case I agree with your idea to include glib.h -- >> > that's w

[Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?

2008-03-30 Thread Keith Richie
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:50:41 +, Duncan wrote: > Keith Richie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 24 Mar 2008 > 18:50:25 +: >snip . > It's cool, isn't it? =8^) No more filling up the mailbox (or gmailbox > either) just to follow a few lists! I

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?

2008-03-30 Thread Beso
2008/3/30, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted > [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 29 Mar 2008 15:40:39 > -0700: > > > > In this particular case I agree with your idea to include glib.h -- > > that's what that header file is for and it would have prevented thi

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?

2008-03-30 Thread Daniel Rahn
On Saturday 29 March 2008 22:00:35 Duncan wrote: > Wouldn't this be a pan implementation, not external, so therefore > should be quotes not angle-brackets? Like so (and is the relative > path still correct in that case?): > > + #include "pan/general/glib-compat.h" If you do it this way, the rela