[Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?

2008-03-29 Thread Duncan
walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 29 Mar 2008 15:40:39 -0700: > In this particular case I agree with your idea to include glib.h -- > that's what that header file is for and it would have prevented this > particular compile error. The problem there, as m

[Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?

2008-03-29 Thread walt
Daniel Rahn wrote: On Thursday 27 March 2008 14:16:01 Duncan wrote: Finally got it compiling and a new version installed now. Updated the bug, now time to restart pan and see if it actually works. =8^) I still think the best option would be to replace any includes of glib/* with just glib.h.

[Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?

2008-03-29 Thread Duncan
Daniel Rahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 29 Mar 2008 12:21:07 +0100: > + #include Wouldn't this be a pan implementation, not external, so therefore should be quotes not angle-brackets? Like so (and is the relative path still correct in that case?):

[Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?

2008-03-29 Thread Duncan
Daniel Rahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:03:39 +0100: > I guess the right thing to do is to come up with a glib-compat.h > containing the hack from bugzilla and then include that glib-compat.h > where up to now the single includes are done.

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?

2008-03-29 Thread Dave Chand
On Mar 27, 2008, at 8:02 AM, Daniel Rahn wrote: Why? g_assert only moved to a different file. You will want to #include That should do the trick with glib 2.16 -Daniel Thanks Daniel, I have been trying out the new llvm-gcc compiler on OS X, and have been getting stuck with the same problem

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?

2008-03-29 Thread Daniel Rahn
On Friday 28 March 2008 21:11:52 Duncan wrote: > So now he's looking at doing something with #if (GLIB_MAJOR_VERSION > == 2 && GLIB_MINOR_VERSION < 16) type hackery, which is more or less > what I had expected might be needed, only he actually knows enough > about it to probably pull it off, while

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?

2008-03-29 Thread Daniel Rahn
On Friday 28 March 2008 21:11:52 Duncan wrote: > So now he's looking at doing something with #if (GLIB_MAJOR_VERSION > == 2 && GLIB_MINOR_VERSION < 16) type hackery, which is more or less > what I had expected might be needed, only he actually knows enough > about it to probably pull it off, while