On Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:39:25 -0400
Dave Chand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I looked at the two image files that stevem refers to, and I get
> > the same results as he: "Denali Sunrise" at 298559 bytes (as
> > reported by Pan) views ok, but "Lake Pend Oreille" at 423726 bytes
> > displays incorre
Dave Chand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:39:25 -0400:
> On Oct 6, 2007, at 6:58 PM, Greg Lee wrote:
>
>> Is it the decoding? When I save the decoded jpeg files with Pan and
>> view them with a different viewer program, they seem perfectly o
On Oct 6, 2007, at 6:58 PM, Greg Lee wrote:
Is it the decoding? When I save the decoded jpeg files with Pan
and view them with a different viewer program, they seem perfectly
okay.
I looked at the two image files that stevem refers to, and I get
the same results as he: "Denali Sunrise" at 2
"Steve Davies", Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:38:17 +0100:
(...)
> Thanks for the feedback. Try the alternative that I am about to
> upload. It now installs the files into the pan directory, but not the
> GTK directory. I tried this here, and it seemed to work. If this fails
> I'll go back to locating the
On 10/18/07, Petr Kovar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Steve Davies", Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:35:05 +0100:
>
> (...)
>
> > > I did notice the duplication - I'll try and work out how to prevent it
> > > beofre the next release :) Glad to hear that it is working - nice
> > > screenshot!
> >
> > Okay, I wo
