On Sat, 2007-09-01 at 06:36 +, Duncan wrote:
> Aniruddha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 01
> Sep 2007 07:36:58 +0200:
> I too miss the total count, unread/total. I'm not sure why Charles ended
> up doing it that way.
>
> However, since sometime aft
On Sat, 2007-09-01 at 06:36 +, Duncan wrote:
> Aniruddha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 01
> Sep 2007 07:36:58 +0200:
>
> > By default pan doesn't display the header count for each group which can
> > make it very difficult to tell which groups are wo
Aniruddha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 01
Sep 2007 07:36:58 +0200:
> By default pan doesn't display the header count for each group which can
> make it very difficult to tell which groups are worth subscribing. Is is
> possible in pan 1.32 to get a header
By default pan doesn't display the header count for each group which can
make it very difficult to tell which groups are worth subscribing. Is is
possible in pan 1.32 to get a header count for all? groups (just like
the stable version?) Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Aniruddha
__