Duncan,
You have made yourself a Linux friend. I saved your messages in my Linux
documents folder for inspiration.
I'll keep an eye out for Linux in a Nutshell and Running Linux. It makes
sense, the O'Reilly books are probably the best written and most densely
packed with information of all
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 00:24:36 +, walt wrote:
> Although Duncan's machine is mucho macho compared to mine ;o) I still
> see instantaneous response when toggling between All and Unread
> articles, so something must be very wrong at your end.
Yeah, that's what I saw on 10.1 as well. It seems 10.
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:48:41 +, Duncan wrote:
> I've not seen anything like that, but with my machine specs (dual
> Opteron 242, not so special now, but 8 gig memory, root and home on a
> 4-disk RAID-6, etc) I'm not really the one to ask about it.
;-) Yeah, this is a low-end T42p with 2 GB o
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:04:49 +, Jim Henderson wrote:
> Just did a fresh install of openSUSE 10.2 (hard drive crashed on me),
> and restored a backup of my home directory data from 10.1.
>
> I noticed that 0.131 on 10.2 tends to have long periods of burying the
> processor when toggling the vi
Jim Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:04:49
+:
> Just did a fresh install of openSUSE 10.2 (hard drive crashed on me),
> and restored a backup of my home directory data from 10.1.
>
> I noticed that 0.131 on 10.2 tends to have lon
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 20:22:25 -0500, Roger T. Imai wrote:
...
>
> About Saving messages, I don't know what the difference is between
> Saving a message and Caching a message is...
Any old articles in the cache will be pushed into the bit bucket when
pan needs to fetch new articles and the cache h
Just did a fresh install of openSUSE 10.2 (hard drive crashed on me), and
restored a backup of my home directory data from 10.1.
I noticed that 0.131 on 10.2 tends to have long periods of burying the
processor when toggling the view from "Match Only Unread Articles". Given
that I was running a bin
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 15:54:25 -0500, Michael Satterwhite wrote:
> I've entered the server
> information - which I know is correct because KNode uses the same info
> perfectly. I tell it to refresh the newsgroup list - which puts a task
> in the list. This is where the problem is. The task shows its
David Shochat wrote:
Van Reuther wrote:
checking for g++... no
checking for c++... no
Your gcc (g++ is the c++ compiler) seems to have uninstalled for some
reason.
What struck me odd is c++... no.
I thought c++ is the cpp package? If so, I have:
No, cpp is the C preprocessor. The C++ comp
David Shochat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 29 Jul 2007
14:07:22 -0400:
> Pan always combines multipart messages (if all the parts are there). I
> don't know if you can tell it /not/ to.
You can't... directly. However, the raw messages are stored in the
"Roger T. Imai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 29 Jul 2007
17:16:57 -0500:
> Duncan:
>
> Thank you so much for your well-considered help. It's great to see that
> the high quality of communications survives in private mailing lists,
> when it's gone down t
Van Reuther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 30 Jul 2007 00:45:59
-0400:
> checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles...
> no checking for g++... no
> checking for c++... no
> checking for gpp... no
> checking for aCC... no
> checkin
Van Reuther wrote:
checking for g++... no
checking for c++... no
Your gcc (g++ is the c++ compiler) seems to have uninstalled for some
reason.
What struck me odd is c++... no.
I thought c++ is the cpp package? If so, I have:
No, cpp is the C preprocessor. The C++ compiler in gcc is normally
13 matches
Mail list logo
