On Oct 24, 2006, at 2:45 AM, Duncan wrote:
I'm not actually sure of the status of any related bugs on this at
this
point.
I have a similar bug open, 364061.
Fortunately for me but unfortunately for fixing this problem, my
connection seems to be trouble-free enough to trigger something
l
Interesting to know that other people seems to have the same problem.
A big info for me is to learn that pan "should" handle this.
This morning, I noticed that, after exactly one hour, without any
action made by me (humh, I think not), the 4 erroneous servers have
been connected once again.
Actu
Rhialto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 24 Oct 2006
01:20:42 +0200:
> IF the time is precise to the nanosecond, which you can't count on. You
> should count on no better than 1-second resolution, %N is probably some
> Linux extension (repeat after me: All t
"Guilhem Bonnefille"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:50:45 +0200:
> I'm running the pan 0.117+patches. Group list can now be downloaded.
> Thanks again!
=8^)
> But I encounter a strange behaviour and I wish to have some explanations.
>
> I'
