Douglas Bollinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:47:54 + (UTC)
>"Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> However, there's apparently a bug in gcc 3.4.x in regard to something pan
>> does, and it's now an older compiler, with most distributions having
>> already moved to g
A lot of people asked to be told when this finally happened,
so here's a heads-up that the rewrite's finally in CVS. :)
See http://pan.rebelbase.com/download/ for details.
cheers,
Charles
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.n
walt wrote:
AFAICT there is no such thing as 'a gcc bug' without specifying which OS
and which gcc version and which patchset. It's enough to drive even a
sane developer to drink (not that I know any sane developers).
Keep your smart mouth to yourself and pass me the bourbon. >:)
__
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 17:39:46 -0400, Douglas Bollinger wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:47:54 + (UTC)
> "Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> However, there's apparently a bug in gcc 3.4.x in regard to something pan
>> does...
> Well, I use Gentoo as well, Duncan, but I'm master of my box
On Mon, 2 Oct 2006 09:47:54 + (UTC)
"Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, there's apparently a bug in gcc 3.4.x in regard to something pan
> does, and it's now an older compiler, with most distributions having
> already moved to gcc 4.x (Gentoo, which I use, is now stable on 4.1.1 on
Peter B. Steiger wrote:
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For the past several versions, pan has wisely truncated that to the left
side of the address, but it keeps the leftmost quote. The result is
when you reply, it writes:
On 10/01/06, "john-jakob said:
Can you drop that left
Bruce Bowler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 02
Oct 2006 11:10:20 -0400:
> I currently read news on at least 3 different machines (2 at work [linux,
> windows], 1 at home[windows]). Keeping straight what I've read, where
> I've read it, etc can be a real pa
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:21:38 -0700
"Travis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is PowerPost available in a Linux version? I know the source code is
> available here: http://powerpost.cjb.net/.
[snipped]
It doesn't seem so. The zip file contains an .exe binary and the
source code contains won't compi
Keep everything on a shared drive and use symbolic links to the
appropriate files on each machine? You may have to set up a VPN unless
you work from home.
I do something similar with Firefox for my emails. Things do get a bit
flaky if you have two copies running on different machines though...
I currently read news on at least 3 different machines (2 at work [linux,
windows], 1 at home[windows]). Keeping straight what I've read, where
I've read it, etc can be a real pain in the ...
What about some sort of "centralized" data store for all of pan's
settings? It would certainly require a
The new Pan seems to ignore whatever I select and adds the headers by date.
On Monday 02 October 2006 09:13, Alen Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 09:55 +, Duncan wrote:
> > "Timothy J. Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun,
> >
> > 01 Oc
Alen Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:13:20 -0700:
> On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 09:55 +, Duncan wrote:
>> "Timothy J. Hamilton"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED],
>> excerpted below, on Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:18:02 -0500:
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 09:55 +, Duncan wrote:
> "Timothy J. Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun,
> 01 Oct 2006 18:18:02 -0500:
>
> > I mostly use Pan for downloading binaries and multipart binaries. It would
> > be
> > really, really nice if the
"Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 01 Oct 2006 23:53:30
+:
> "Timothy J. Hamilton"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> excerpted below, on Sun, 01 Oct 2006 18:05:03 -0500:
>
>> I'm using 0.115 on Kubuntu.
>>
>> Is it possible to
On Sun 01 Oct 2006 at 23:59:11 +, Duncan wrote:
> Renamed subject to give it a bit more weight.
>
> Those on x86 shouldn't see a difference one way or the other, but amd64
> and possibly other non-x86 archs will need the patch in 358654. Take the
> second patch, which includes both the first
"Timothy J. Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun,
01 Oct 2006 18:18:02 -0500:
> I mostly use Pan for downloading binaries and multipart binaries. It would be
> really, really nice if the task manager would queue the headers for
> downloading in the sam
"Peter B. Steiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sun, 01 Oct 2006 23:45:19 -0600:
> I was having a heck of a time building with gcc 3.4.6 in 512MB; it kept
> hanging on scorefile-test until I looked through the archives and found
> a suggestion to remove -O2 fr
17 matches
Mail list logo
