"walt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 01:28:53
+:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 01:55:25 +0100, Thufir wrote:
>
>> The message id domain name can be configured from tools > posting profiles...
>
> Hmm. I don't see a 'tools' menu anywhere. Have I
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 02:41:44 +0100, Thufir wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 01:28:53 +, walt wrote:
>> Hmm. I don't see a 'tools' menu anywhere. Have I gone blind?
> You're there :)
> ...If you'll notice, the header for my messages now reflect my FQDN
> (fully qualified domain name), which i
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:32:04 +, walt wrote:
> I know that, technically speaking, this problem is PEBKAC ;o)
>
> However, I've been caught by this same irritation so many times
> that I thought I'd invite other opinions.
>
> The only time I search for group names in the Group Pane is
> when I
"walt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:32:04
+:
> I know that, technically speaking, this problem is PEBKAC ;o)
>
> However, I've been caught by this same irritation so many times
> that I thought I'd invite other opinions.
>
> The only
walt wrote:
>
> IMO, the group-search widget should be blanked out any time
> I return to the Groups Pane. My reason for searching for
> alt.foo is gone -- I've already found it and decided not to
> subscribe.
>
> Any contrary opinions?
I disagree since some people might have large subscribed
walt wrote:
> IMO, the group-search widget should be blanked out any time
> I return to the Groups Pane. My reason for searching for
> alt.foo is gone -- I've already found it and decided not to
> subscribe.
>
> Any contrary opinions?
What you are suggesting would be fine for a single group se
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 01:28:53 +, walt wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 01:55:25 +0100, Thufir wrote:
>
>> The message id domain name can be configured from tools > posting profiles...
>
> Hmm. I don't see a 'tools' menu anywhere. Have I gone blind?
>
> I see Edit > Posting Profiles, but nothin
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 01:55:25 +0100, Thufir wrote:
> The message id domain name can be configured from tools > posting profiles...
Hmm. I don't see a 'tools' menu anywhere. Have I gone blind?
I see Edit > Posting Profiles, but nothing relating to domain names.
I will move my ~/.pan2 out of the
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 00:02:45 +, walt wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:37:42 +0100, Thufir wrote:
>
>
>> Is this a pan or leafnode problem? I'm fairly sure that pan is generating
>> the message-id, when, perhaps, it's best left to leafnode...?
>
> Based on my quick tests just now, I'd say th
I know that, technically speaking, this problem is PEBKAC ;o)
However, I've been caught by this same irritation so many times
that I thought I'd invite other opinions.
The only time I search for group names in the Group Pane is
when I want to investigate a group I'm not already subscribed
to. (I
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:37:42 +0100, Thufir wrote:
> Is this a pan or leafnode problem? I'm fairly sure that pan is generating
> the message-id, when, perhaps, it's best left to leafnode...?
Based on my quick tests just now, I'd say that pan is letting the server
generate the message ID. In my
Update
The previous problem was when I hit update all subscribed. If I update
just a.b.dvd I do get a crash after a while. Spits out:
GThread-ERROR **: file gthread-posix.c: line 353 (): error 'Cannot
allocate memory' during 'pthread_create'
aborting...
Aborted
fred wrote:
Hey Guys
R
I set up a FQDN for leafnode for the purpose of posting, but now realize
that my posts have "gmail.com" in the message-id, instead of my FQDN.
my hostname:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ hostname
arrakis.homelinux.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ telnet localhost nntp
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:13:55 -0500, fred wrote:
> Thufir
>
> If you are talking about the "puzzle piece" when it is read it means the
> post is incomplete(missing pieces) . When it is green the post is complete.
[...]
Aha!
thanks,
Thufir
___
Pan
Hey Guys
Running FC5 and 0.113. Pan is soaking up 1.5gb of 2gb of memory when
left running overnight. I am not seeing a crash. I am using a lot of
large binaries (a.b.dvd etc). When I compiled I did not get any errors
and it past the checks without incident. Any suggestions?
Thanks
Lazlow
Charles Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:37:13
-0500:
> My guess is that it was the duplicate posts that 0.111-0.112 created
> as a side-effect of the 0.111 speedups. 0.113 fixes this duplication
> for new headers, but doesn't retroactive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 10:39:10 -0500
Charles Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> This is an incremental release to get everyone on the same page
> >> after the flurry of reports in the "how's 0.113 working for you?"
> >> thread. We /may/ have one more r
George Sherwood wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:02:22 -0500 (CDT)
"Charles Kerr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is an incremental release to get everyone on the same page after
the flurry of reports in the "how's 0.113 working for you?" thread.
We /
walt wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 13:23:47 -1000, Kevin Brammer wrote:
...
I just found that when I compiled .113, I had to delete my .pan2
directory, otherwise I suffered the same effects as .112. Maybe it
was some pan-generated config file, or a corrupted cache of some
sort...no idea.
Me eith
19 matches
Mail list logo
