Original Message
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
u.org] On Behalf Of Artur Jachacy
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 17:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Pan-users] Re: ANN: 0.113 "0.113 is one of Nakata's
favorites"
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:02:22 -0500, Charles Kerr wrot
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 19:02:22 -0500, Charles Kerr wrote:
> This is an incremental release to get everyone on the same page after
> the flurry of reports in the "how's 0.113 working for you?" thread.
> We /may/ have one more release before the 1.0 freeze. I'm especially
> interested in hearing more
This is an incremental release to get everyone on the same page after
the flurry of reports in the "how's 0.113 working for you?" thread.
We /may/ have one more release before the 1.0 freeze. I'm especially
interested in hearing more details about the lockups that a few people
have reported. New
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 23:11:46 +0100, Robert Marshall wrote:
> I can fairly reliably produce a lockup with 0.112, not quite certain
> of the sequence but it involves being in tabbed layout, opening an
> article, opening the child of that article then which I click on the
> subject tab it hangs on me
>> Just downloaded 0.112 from http://panbuilds.googlepages.com/. I can
>> move
>> from group to group at will unless I've read a message. Once I read a
>> message, any attempt to move to a different group causes pan to become
>> "non-responsive". Haven't see this behaviour on an of the prior beta
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, George Sherwood wrote:
>
> Is any one else seeing lockups with 0.112? If I get new headers and
> then click on the newsgroup pan will freeze up and I have to use
> kill. After this if I restart pan, I click on the group and all
> acts normally. I downgraded to 0.111 and am
On Sep 18, 2006, at 9:52 AM, Brian Pack wrote:
So maybe the limit is a good thing. Although I'd be happier with a
limit of 5
or 6. :)
Is likely your ISP's newserver limits bandwidth by the connection.
Try dropping the connection count to 2 in pan as a quick and simple
bandwidth limit ex
Brian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon,
18 Sep 2006 19:43:21 +0100:
> On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:52:40 -0400
> Brian Pack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> So maybe the limit is a good thing. Although I'd be happier with a limit
>> of 5 or 6. :)
>
> GNKSA
On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 10:52:40 -0400
Brian Pack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So maybe the limit is a good thing. Although I'd be happier with a limit of 5
> or 6. :)
GNKSA specifies a maximum of 4 connections, but there is nothing to
stop you editing that limit yourself and building a non GNKSA-co
On Sunday 17 September 2006 20:55, Alen Williams wrote:
> When I'm downloading from my ISP it'll take ALL the bandwidth of my DSL
> line (woohoo). Which is both good, nice and fast, and bad, you can't do
> anything else really.
>
> I'd like the ability to set the maximum amount of bandwidth that Pa
10 matches
Mail list logo
