Hello.
I had posted a bug relating to "reply to author" icon which is the twin
of "reply to newsgroup" one.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=352014
In order to avoid problems while replying, I am searching for a new
icon, but as I am the worst artist on earth... ;)
Do you have any ide
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:22:02 -0500 (CDT)
"Charles Kerr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Duncan is absolutely right about -g, though I'd go further and recommend
> adding -ggdb3 to your CFLAGS before compiling glib/atk/pango/gtk/gmime.
>
> Likewise I'd add -ggdb3 to your CXXFLAGS before compiling Pan
Duncan wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:01:18 -0400, Douglas Bollinger wrote:
>> Does having my entire system (and espcially the gtk libs) compiled with
>> -fomit-frame-pointer pretty much render my system useless for debugging?
>
> That's what I've read, yes. OTOH, man gcc says that -fomit-frame
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:15:54 -0400, Douglas Bollinger wrote:
.
.
.
> Ok guys, I compiled gtk+ without the -fomit-frame-pointer flag...
>
> (gdb) run
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0xb7e9ce0e in gtk_tree_view_set_fixed_height_mode ()...
The problem I see is that those big hexadecimal numbers, like
0xb7e9ce0e, a
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:09:46 + (UTC)
"Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For x86 (and therefore for 32-bit x86 compatible code on amd64), omitting
> the frame-pointer DOES affect debugging, but ONLY on the libraries and
> executables where the flag is used. (As a result it's not enabled by
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 23:57:32 +, Duncan wrote:
[...]
> The bottom line is that something isn't quite functional, but from this
> alone, we don't know if it's pan or your environment settings or what. If
> you can figure it out and narrow it down to pan, that's a pan bug Charles
> will be inter
Douglas Bollinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 21 Aug 2006
18:01:18 -0400:
> Does having my entire system (and espcially the gtk libs) compiled with
> -fomit-frame-pointer pretty much render my system useless for debugging?
I don't claim to be a "coding
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:01:18 -0400, Douglas Bollinger wrote:
.
.
.
> Does having my entire system (and espcially the gtk libs) compiled with
> -fomit-frame-pointer pretty much render my system useless for debugging?
That's what I've read, yes. OTOH, man gcc says that -fomit-frame-pointer
is auto
