I just added a comment to
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=346588
after trying 0.107, suse 10.1 and a trial subscription to giganews
(news.giganews.com). I was a little surprised to see that I still get
the segfault when I try to display the full group list. So... is there
someone on
Duncan wrote:
> I'm thinking perhaps 0.108, presumably next week, might be the last
> pre-1.0, the way things are shaping up)
That would surprise me -- there really have been a frightful number
of bug reports over the past few days. I'm not promising anything,
but perhaps three more betas.
chee
I've been compiling every release for the past month or so. Using
0.107 now. Two tiny requests (the first might be considered a bug) :
(1) When I save attachments, there isn't a "saved" icon anymore...
this existed in the old Pan, and without that icon it's very difficult
to know which attachment
Duncan wrote:
Benjamin Esham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just to clarify… are the unread headers supposed to be underlined?
Threads with unread are underlined when collapsed, but there is no
underline once these threads are expanded.
Read posts with unread replies are underlined when the thr
"Peter B. Steiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:40:06 -0600:
> There's a .107? I need to read this listserve more often... I'm still
> on .100!
Yes. Please update and try it out, as 1.0 is getting very close now (some
time this month is
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 20:31 +, Duncan wrote:
> Hmm. I wasn't aware of that as I had reverted to 0.105 due to the
> posting
> bug in 0.106 (always saying I was closing the compose window without
> sending or saving, even tho it had sent), and 0.105 was lacking that
> option. However, I see it n
Darren wrote:
Sam wrote:
Hmmm I've compiled from source.. with no additional flags and I'm
having the issue with .107. None of the links pop up. I haven't tried an
embedded in message link as I haven't run across any but the help menu
links are non functional even in .107.
Sam
When you ran
Per Hedeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue,
08 Aug 2006 23:05:24 +0200:
> And finally something on-topic:-) - it's already there (thankfully)! At
> least in 0.106, not sure when it was added. With GUI and all - look
> under View -> Body Pane, right where it
Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 09 Aug 2006 09:03:18
-0700:
> Darren wrote:
>>
>> Duncan wrote:
>> > They say that one advantage of open source is that given the world as an
>>> audience, all bugs are shallow -- someone will know what's up right away.
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006 13:44:19 -0500
Benjamin Esham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to clarify… are the unread headers supposed to be underlined?
> Threads with unread are underlined when collapsed, but there is no
> underline once these threads are expanded.
Here's how it works, at least, ho
Benjamin Esham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed,
09 Aug 2006 13:44:19 -0500:
> Just to clarify… are the unread headers supposed to be underlined?
> Threads with unread are underlined when collapsed, but there is no
> underline once these threads are expan
Benjamin Esham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Darren wrote:
>
>> Benjamin Esham wrote:
>>
>>> I'll try this, but I'd prefer a solution that doesn't involve hacking
>>> the source (since I'll just have to patch again once a newer
>>> version is
>>> released). Also, unread headers are not underline
Darren wrote:
Benjamin Esham wrote:
I'll try this, but I'd prefer a solution that doesn't involve hacking
the source (since I'll just have to patch again once a newer
version is
released). Also, unread headers are not underlined for me—they
are not
displayed any differently from read hea
Benjamin Esham wrote:
>
> I'll try this, but I'd prefer a solution that doesn't involve hacking
> the source (since I'll just have to patch again once a newer version is
> released). Also, unread headers are not underlined for me—they are not
> displayed any differently from read headers at all.
Peter B. Steiger wrote:
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 10:53 -0500, Benjamin Esham wrote:
I'm sure this has been discussed before, but I couldn't find it in
the archives... how can I make read and unread articles display in
different colors?
I had to add a line to header-pane.cc:
... I just hunted
Sam wrote:
> Hmmm I've compiled from source.. with no additional flags and I'm
> having the issue with .107. None of the links pop up. I haven't tried an
> embedded in message link as I haven't run across any but the help menu
> links are non functional even in .107.
>
> Sam
When you ran conf
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 10:53 -0500, Benjamin Esham wrote:
> I'm sure this has been discussed before, but I couldn't find it in
> the archives... how can I make read and unread articles display in
> different colors?
I had to add a line to header-pane.cc:
--- ../../../pan-0.100/pan/gui/header-
Charles Kerr said
> Lenny_Nero wrote:
>> More so windows 2000 ?
>>
>> I gave the web site pre-built a spin a few days ago, and at least it can
>> start to load (more than ever before ;) but crashes before it can finish
>> drawing the windows.
>>
>> I have tried this on a new box I was building u
Darren wrote:
Duncan wrote:
> They say that one advantage of open source is that given the world as an
audience, all bugs are shallow -- someone will know what's up right away.
This one proves the point, as I believe I know /exactly/ what's happening,
having run into it myself, but believed i
On Aug 8, 2006, at 8:33 PM, David Shochat wrote:
Benjamin Esham wrote:
I'm trying to build Pan 0.107 on Mac OS X; I have fink installed.
I'm
having trouble getting it compiled.
[snip]
In file included from e-util.cc:32:
/sw/include/glib-2.0/glib/gi18n.h:23:21: error: libintl.h: No such
Hello all,
I'm sure this has been discussed before, but I couldn't find it in
the archives... how can I make read and unread articles display in
different colors? As it is, they're both black for me, and the
header list is almost useless.
Thanks for any help!
--
Benjamin D. Esham
[EMAIL
Duncan wrote:
> They say that one advantage of open source is that given the world as an
> audience, all bugs are shallow -- someone will know what's up right away.
> This one proves the point, as I believe I know /exactly/ what's happening,
> having run into it myself, but believed it to be de
Darren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue,
08 Aug 2006 16:34:05 -0400:
> Can a KDE user click the various links under the help menu (Pan Home
> Page, Tip Jar etc...) and report if they works or not?
>
> This is regarding Bug 349778:
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/
Christian Lohmaier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 08
Aug 2006 23:47:50 +0200:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 04:25:02PM -0500, Charles Kerr wrote:
>> August 8, 2006 - Pan 0.107: "Umi De No Jisatsu"
>> [...]
>> 350371 if 'show all headers' was on and 'followup'
24 matches
Mail list logo
