On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 14:42:56 +1200, Steven Ellis wrote:
> Anyone out there attempting a build for RHEL4 or Centos4? They only ship
> PCRE 4.5 and it appears that PCRE 5 is a requirement. Anyone got a good
> resource for a RHEL4 version of PCRE 5?
I've tried all the new betas on CentOS 4.3. They
> Hi everyone,
>
> pan now seems to dedicate all available connections to
> downloading headers. While this is great when nothing
> else is going on, it does interrupt the downloading of
> binaries. I personally like to start some items
> downloading, and then while that's going on I'll go to
>
Hi everyone,
pan now seems to dedicate all available connections to
downloading headers. While this is great when nothing
else is going on, it does interrupt the downloading of
binaries. I personally like to start some items
downloading, and then while that's going on I'll go to
another group to
On 8/3/06, Brad Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You're not the only one seeing this behaviour. I too, would like per
group sorting back. It's not "urgent" for me, but a "would be nice
if...".
Oh, yeah, it's not "urgent" for me either, really. I can definately
put up with changing the sort
Hi Charles, hi Group,
reading an article isn't always the top most task?
If I download binaries sorted with "Add to the front of the queue" and
"Add to the back of the queue" single-clicked articles are added to the
back of the queue. This behavior is annoying if you want to read some
articl
Per Hedeland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu,
03 Aug 2006 15:52:10 +0200:
> After a lot of googling (seems this is a common annoyance) I found that
> creating a ~/.gtkrc-2.0 file with
>
>
> style "packed" {
> GtkTreeView::vertical-separator = 0
>
Charles Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Duncan wrote:
>>
>> There has been some debate on the line spacing in the header pane.
>> Christophe Lambin was the one that commented how much larger it was, I
>> believe, back in April/May? I think it was if you want to check the list
>> archive. IIRC
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 01:53:06 -0500
"Shining Chaos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Shining,
> Has Pan decided to go with a global header sort order now, instead of
> the older method of remembering each group's last sort order? Text
You're not the only one seeing this behaviour. I too, would l
"Shining Chaos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Thu, 03 Aug 2006 01:53:06 -0500:
> Has Pan decided to go with a global header sort order now, instead of
> the older method of remembering each group's last sort order? Text
> groups I like to sort by date (newest
