RE: [Pan-users] Wanted: Linux Format issue #42

2006-07-29 Thread Travis
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shining Chaos Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 19:59 To: pan-users@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Wanted: Linux Format issue #42 On 7

Re: [Pan-users] Building on Mac -- status

2006-07-29 Thread David Shochat
Quoting David Sewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > David Sochat wrote: > > [libintl.h path fix description snipped] > > > Thanks. That worked here also. pan-0.103 now running on the iMac. > > I'm having a problem with .104/.105 under OS X. Configuration okay, and > the compile goes okay until I hit a lot

Re: [Pan-users] Building on Mac -- status

2006-07-29 Thread David Sewell
David Sochat wrote: [libintl.h path fix description snipped] Thanks. That worked here also. pan-0.103 now running on the iMac. I'm having a problem with .104/.105 under OS X. Configuration okay, and the compile goes okay until I hit a lot of multiple definition errors when it gets to this p

Re: [Pan-users] Wanted: Linux Format issue #42

2006-07-29 Thread Shining Chaos
On 7/29/06, Robert Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Robert Marshall wrote:I have found LXF42 which does have a half page review of 0.14.0 on page 40,haven't laid my hands on #47 yet - though ISTR pan getting a mention in thereaders rewards one year in LXF. Don't have a scann

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: blank Action column

2006-07-29 Thread eto
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:17:20PM +, walt wrote: > > Just as an aside, I still find debian-based linux distributions a royal > pain the the backside to configure. I give the ubuntu team a lot of > credit for making it better than Debian itself -- but I am not the > least bit tempted to swit

RE: [Pan-users] Wanted: Linux Format issue #42

2006-07-29 Thread Travis
Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] u.org] On Behalf Of Robert Marshall Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 03:07 To: pan-users@nongnu.org Subject: RE: [Pan-users] Wanted: Linux Format issue #42 > On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Travis wrote: > >> Original Message >>

RE: [Pan-users] Wanted: Linux Format issue #42

2006-07-29 Thread Robert Marshall
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Travis wrote: > Original Message > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > u.org] On Behalf Of Robert Marshall > Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 01:18 > To: pan-users@nongnu.org > Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Wanted: Linux Format issue #42 > >> I have found

[Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: Re: blank Action column

2006-07-29 Thread Duncan
"Charles Kerr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 28 Jul 2006 21:22:05 -0500: > It's a Pan bug. It updates sometimes, but not consistently, > which is very annoying. I'll have it fixed for the next release. Thanks. It's not half as annoying when I know it's

RE: [Pan-users] Wanted: Linux Format issue #42

2006-07-29 Thread Travis
Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] u.org] On Behalf Of Robert Marshall Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 01:18 To: pan-users@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Wanted: Linux Format issue #42 > On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Robert Marshall wrote: > >> On Fri, 28 Jul 200

Re: [Pan-users] Wanted: Linux Format issue #42

2006-07-29 Thread Robert Marshall
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Robert Marshall wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Charles Kerr wrote: > >> That would be great too, but I'm looking at LXF81 and it >> says: "We reviewed 0.14.0 in LXF42". Maybe it's a misprint, >> or maybe Pan's in both issues. >> > > I should have LXF42 but it isn't where it