Re: [Pan-users] blank Action column

2006-07-26 Thread kourosh
Ken Geis wrote: I'm running Pan 0.104. There is an Action column in which I never see anything. So, compared to Pan 0.14, I have no indication that a message is queued for download. Is it just me having this problem? Ken I'm having the same problem and would love for it to come back. M

[Pan-users] blank Action column

2006-07-26 Thread Ken Geis
I'm running Pan 0.104. There is an Action column in which I never see anything. So, compared to Pan 0.14, I have no indication that a message is queued for download. Is it just me having this problem? Ken ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@no

Re: [Pan-users] ANN: Pan 0.105 "When Churchill opened the door, it was a new car, a Chevrolet Nova."

2006-07-26 Thread Charles Kerr
> Charles Kerr wrote: >> This is weekly beta #16 of a full Pan redesign and rewrite in C++. >> It fills out the all the 'hey you forgot' mail that came in when >> I incorrectly said that the last release was feature-complete for >> the upcoming 1.0 release. :) > > Wait! Is it Sunday already?!? ;-

[Pan-users] Re: feature request: show arbitrary headers

2006-07-26 Thread John Steele Scott
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:59:23 +, Duncan wrote: > (Do a search for a similar open request first tho, in case someone's > already requested it, thus avoiding a duplicate. Still post a bug link in > any case, tho, so others can add their vote if they want.) Aha, this is bug 131212:

Re: [Pan-users] ANN: Pan 0.105 "When Churchill opened the door, it was a new car, a Chevrolet Nova."

2006-07-26 Thread Darren
Charles Kerr wrote: > This is weekly beta #16 of a full Pan redesign and rewrite in C++. > It fills out the all the 'hey you forgot' mail that came in when > I incorrectly said that the last release was feature-complete for > the upcoming 1.0 release. :) Wait! Is it Sunday already?!? ;-) _

[Pan-users] ANN: Pan 0.105 "When Churchill opened the door, it was a new car, a Chevrolet Nova."

2006-07-26 Thread Charles Kerr
This is weekly beta #16 of a full Pan redesign and rewrite in C++. It fills out the all the 'hey you forgot' mail that came in when I incorrectly said that the last release was feature-complete for the upcoming 1.0 release. :) Bug tickets closed for this release http://tinyurl.com/ot9vo. Feedbac

Re: [Pan-users] Re: selecting groups in pan 0.1xx

2006-07-26 Thread Thomas Fricke
Artur Jachacy wrote: ah... kinda missed that one. thx Artur. bye... Thomas ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users

Re: [Pan-users] Re: Pan .104 crashes

2006-07-26 Thread eto
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 04:26:11PM +, Artur Jachacy wrote: > See Ah, so it looks like this will be fixed in the next update. ___ Pan-users mailing list Pan-users@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org

[Pan-users] Re: before 1.0 or not?

2006-07-26 Thread Duncan
"Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:30:18 +: > I don't necessarily expect all of those to make it into 1.0 Wow, not only are most of them looking to make it now, but a good share were implemented on a rather less than 24-hour turn-ar

[Pan-users] Re: Choosing Your Posting Server (Was: 1.0 or not?)

2006-07-26 Thread Duncan
"Steve Davies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:48:11 +0100: > On 7/25/06, Charles Kerr wrote: > >> [Duncan wrote...] >> >> > [Suggestion: What about the] posting server a function of the posting >> > profile? http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bu

[Pan-users] Re: Pan .104 crashes

2006-07-26 Thread Artur Jachacy
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:12:21 -0700, eto-0i7Gww0lp8HYtjvyW6yDsg wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 09:05:11AM -0700, kourosh wrote: > >> I'm on Debian unstable for amd64 and am getting a crash on Pan. This >> happens after I mark a bunch of articles for download. It happens after >> I've marked se

Re: [Pan-users] Pan .104 crashes

2006-07-26 Thread eto
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 09:05:11AM -0700, kourosh wrote: > I'm on Debian unstable for amd64 and am getting a crash on Pan. This > happens after I mark a bunch of articles for download. It happens after > I've marked several thousand for download. > > (article-cache.cc:408 get_message): assertio

[Pan-users] Pan .104 crashes

2006-07-26 Thread kourosh
Hi all, I'm on Debian unstable for amd64 and am getting a crash on Pan. This happens after I mark a bunch of articles for download. It happens after I've marked several thousand for download. (article-cache.cc:408 get_message): assertion "this->contains(*it)" failed. *** glibc detected *** dou

Re: [Pan-users] 0.104 and VNC

2006-07-26 Thread eto
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 02:33:59PM -0700, kourosh wrote: > jef_e said the following on 07/24/2006 05:39 PM: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I just downloaded the 0.104 tarball, compiled it, and tried to run it > >> within a VNC session. I got the following error: > >> > >> Error: Cairo does not

[Pan-users] Re: selecting groups in pan 0.1xx

2006-07-26 Thread Duncan
"Artur Jachacy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 25 Jul 2006 23:00:19 +: > On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 22:53:56 +0200, Thomas Fricke wrote: > >> is someone able to select more than one group in the group pane? > >

[Pan-users] Re: feature request: show arbitrary headers

2006-07-26 Thread Duncan
John Steele Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:25:31 +0900: > I often use Pan to read groups on gmane. I use pan on gmane to follow this group/list. =8^) > Gmane appends an "Archived-At" header to all messages, which contains a > permanen

Re: [Pan-users] Choosing Your Posting Server (Was: 1.0 or not?)

2006-07-26 Thread Steve Davies
On 7/25/06, Charles Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 4. Thanks for getting the per-group posting-profile thing pre-1.0. =8^) > Might it be possible to make the posting server a function of the posting > profile? It's not a big issue for me presently as my groups are > server-exclusive where it

Re: [Pan-users] 0.104 beta RPMs for Mandriva 2006

2006-07-26 Thread Glenn
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 10:07, Bill Pier wrote: > I uploaded the source and build RPMs for 0.104 for Mandriva 2006 > to the 'contributing packages' link on the download page. The 0.104 > build works fine though the RPMs that I sent have yet to appear anywhere. > The source RPM builds with none of