On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:23:02 -0500, Charles Kerr wrote:
> mike wrote:
>> [quoted text muted]
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> This was a 0.101 bug that was fixed in 0.102.
>
> cheers,
> Charles
Kewl, so its not just me. ;)
I think the latest version of pan on Seer-of-Souls is the .101. I guess
I'll have to j
Brad Sims wrote:
> How do I disable this feature?
I don't think you can, I would suggest filing a feature enhancement
request to bugzilla.gnome.org for Pan so Charles can look into it.
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu
How do I disable this feature?
--
"You have to give this much to the Luftwaffe: when it knocked down our
buildings it did not replace them with anything more offensive than
rubble. We did that."
-- Charles, Prince of Wales
__
i'm glad to see that development has started again for pan!
to successfully compile the .103 release on freebsd 6.1, i needed to
set an environment variable. using the bash shell:
export CPPFLAGS=-L/usr/local/include
it seems like the configure script should make that unnecessary. from
a littl
Hi Charles,
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 11:52:01AM -0500, Charles Kerr wrote:
> Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> > [...]
> >Adding #include back to pan/general/string-view.h allows it
> >to compile.
>
> Hi Christian,
>
> Instead of adding #include to pan/general/string-view.h,
> does adding #include t
Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi Charles, *,
pan 0.100 and newer fail to compile with gcc 3.2.3 because of the change
in pan/general/string-view.h (now includes iosfwd instead of iostream)
It fails with:
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I/usr/include/gmime-2.0
-I/opt/gnome2/include/
Artur Jachacy wrote:
Well that's reason enough for me! UUCP should be good enough for all of
you, with your newfangled NNTP and HTTP and stuff. And man, am I angry
that my ISP turned off telnet in favor of some upstart protocol called
SHH or something ;-)
So, I take it you're prepared to
walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:42:47
-0700:
> The subject of threading in binaries groups has always confused me anyway,
> and I've never figured out how to do exactly what I really want: i.e.
> sort posts in roughly chronological order
Hi Charles, *,
pan 0.100 and newer fail to compile with gcc 3.2.3 because of the change
in pan/general/string-view.h (now includes iosfwd instead of iostream)
It fails with:
if g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I/usr/include/gmime-2.0
-I/opt/gnome2/include/glib-2.0 -I/opt/gnome2/lib/g
Hi Steve, *,
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 11:11:46AM +0100, Steve Davies wrote:
> On 7/11/06, jef_e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Artur Jachacy wrote:
> >> Charles Kerr wrote:
> >>> Can anyone think of a reason for Pan to /not/ behave that way?
> >
> >> Because that's not how it's been done. That shoul
>
> If you mean sources checked out from CVS, that would explain it.
> CVS has pan 0.14.90, not the newest. The 0.103 sources are only
> available from the pan.rebelbase.com website.
Embarrassment. It's amazing how much better the version I just compiled
runs than the packaged version I had inst
Bradford R. Bowman wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 22:36 -0400, Darren wrote:
>> Bradford R. Bowman wrote:
>>> Second: I have read references on this list recently to the new Pan
>>> having nzb support. I know this may sound dense, but once I have my nzb
>>> file, how do I get Pan to make use of i
jef_e wrote:
Artur Jachacy wrote:
Charles Kerr wrote:
Can anyone think of a reason for Pan to /not/ behave that way?
Because that's not how it's been done. That should be reason enough.
Well that's reason enough for me! UUCP should be good enough for all of
you, with your newfangled NNTP
On 7/11/06, jef_e <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Artur Jachacy wrote:
> Charles Kerr wrote:
>> Can anyone think of a reason for Pan to /not/ behave that way?
> Because that's not how it's been done. That should be reason enough.
:) I can kind of agree with the sentiment...
In fact I think that th
14 matches
Mail list logo
