On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 16:57 -0400, jef_e wrote:
> Duncan wrote:
> > I like the ideas myself so don't want them getting lost either, so
> > indeed, please file them on bugzilla.
>
>
> Agreed, please file these requests. I love the multiple tabbed groups
> idea. I sometimes like to hop around group
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006 12:41:19 -0600 (MDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Reiss) wrote:
> Personally I disagree...I think that's true for text newsreading, but
> when primarily using pan for binary harvesting it's really nice to be able
> to see which headers are new, since you don't actually read binary pos
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006 09:25:16 + (UTC)
"Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That would appear to be a bug, then. I never use that combination,
> instead setting view unread only (matching articles only) by default,
> toggling to view all, occasionally, when I need to go upline to get
> context
> So anyway, you don't get the distinction between old unread and new
> messages that old-pan had, but neither Charles nor myself believe that's a
> big issue. Read/unread is good enough.
Personally I disagree...I think that's true for text newsreading, but
when primarily using pan for binary harv
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006 01:35:10 -0500 (CDT)
"Charles Kerr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Charles,
> The most-requested missing feature -- the ability to specify a posting
> charset -- is finally back in 0.102. For alt.binaries users who
Compiled and running without trouble under Mandriva 2006.
Charles Kerr wrote:
> It's a new week, and time for another release of Pan!
>
I was wondering if it is possible to provide binary package for WinXP.
As I don't have knowledge or the tools to compile it on windows, I am
currently using 0.98, which is working nicely at the moment. I want to
hel
Douglas Bollinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 01 Jul 2006
14:03:12 -0400:
> Just to nail this down completely, I'm using "Show Matching Article's Threads"
> and "Match only unread articles". I expect to see unread articles threaded
> correctly with read