[Pan-users] [.100] Server authentication issues

2006-06-21 Thread Jeff Berman
Hi all, I subscribe to a 3rd party Usenet service. Ever since the .9x betas appeared, pan has periodically stalled out on Binary downloads. The only way to recover is to quit and restart pan. Has anyone else seen this? There's nothing revealing in the Event log so I don't really know what th

[Pan-users] 0.100 - Error on downloading binaries

2006-06-21 Thread Mike Houwers
With the minor changes, 0.100 compiles and starts fine under Windows 2000. Text articles download fine.However, when I try to download a binary, the event log fills up with:Wed Jun 21 21:13:20 2006 - Making a new connection to <> Wed Jun 21 21:13:20 2006 - Error reading from socket: Invalid byte se

Re: [Pan-users] ANN: Pan 0.100 "Hey, I like this. Early Nothing!"

2006-06-21 Thread Charles Kerr
Garrison Hoffman wrote: It was indeed worth the rate; thanks and congratulations. I especially like the N days' headers option. :) Is there a story attached to the text associated with each release? Usually nothing a few minutes' Googling can't turn up. It's usually a line from a book or

Re: [Pan-users] Re: ANN: Pan 0.100 "Hey, I like this. Early Nothing!"

2006-06-21 Thread Charles Kerr
Kevin Brammer wrote: Whenever I build these betas, I get a warning about not being able to find libgnome. What does libgnome provide the application? Should I get it? If you build Pan with Gnome, then it lets Gnome handle the urls you click on (such as pulling up email apps or a web browse

[Pan-users] Re: First glance at .100

2006-06-21 Thread Duncan
"Peter B. Steiger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:35:27 -0600: > Lookin' good! As promised, it's faster, smaller, and able to leap tall > buildings in a single bound. =8^) > Some features I really loved in 0.9x >From the below, I'm assumi

[Pan-users] Re: 0.100 downloads marked as saved

2006-06-21 Thread Duncan
Charles Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:52:15 -0500: > Duncan wrote: > >> (Yeah, you're the one doing the work, but I guess I can call PAN "my" > > project too, after these years.) > > Hm. Well, I certainly appreciate the