On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 14:57 -0700, Michael A. Peters wrote:
> I've had a couple of crashes now when trying to search by author.
> The newsgroups where it has happened are comp.text.tex and comp.fonts
>
> It has never happened when I freshly start pan, but if I leave pan
> running for awhile - it w
Hi Charles,
I've been dealing with a debugging problem which has
been more difficult because of pan's consolidation of
news servers into one big group-list. Maybe someone
here has some ideas to contribute.
I subscribe to a pay news service with three separate
server farms which are separated wid
I've had a couple of crashes now when trying to search by author.
The newsgroups where it has happened are comp.text.tex and comp.fonts
It has never happened when I freshly start pan, but if I leave pan
running for awhile - it will happen (sometimes) as I'm typing in the
person I want to search fo
On Wed, 17 May 2006 12:40:56 + (UTC)
"Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Duncan,
> A bit more detail, since it could be useful to you and possibly
> others.
[snip]
Thanks, Duncan. I suspect I could have figured all that out
(eventually), but as you say, it's as well to have it spelt o
walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 17 May 2006 11:05:34
-0700:
> Duncan wrote:
>
>> Off the wall question, but how much memory do you have, and you are on
>> x86, right?...
>
> Half-gig of memory, AMD K7. I ran vmstat while building just now, and
> 'fre
Duncan wrote:
> walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
>
>> But all is well now -- both pan and thunderbird like gcc 3.4.5 :o)
> Off the wall question, but how much memory do you have, and you are on
> x86, right?...
Half-gig of memory, AMD K7. I ran vmstat while building just now, and
'free' memory n
Brad Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 16 May 2006
20:04:40 +0100:
>> > glib1 1.2.10
>> > glib2 2.8.0
>> This is entirely a valid installation - but note your glib2 version is
>
> Thanks for the confirmation. If pushed, I'd have said I thought it
> wa
walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 16 May 2006 11:57:42
-0700:
> But all is well now -- both pan and thunderbird like gcc 3.4.5 :o)
Off the wall question, but how much memory do you have, and you are on
x86, right?
The reason I ask is because I'm on amd6
On Wed, 17 May 2006 10:24:20 +0100
Brad Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello All,
> > ftp://ftp.proxad.net/mirrors/ftp.mandriva.com/MandrivaLinux/devel/cooker/SRPMS/main/pan-0.97-1mdk.src.rpm
> > rpm --rebuild pan-0.97-1mdk.src.rpm rpm
> > -Uvh /usr/src/RPM/RPMS/i586/pan-0.97-0.1.20060mdk.i586
Darren,
Please do, it would be very helpful.
I *really* appreciate it!
Matt
On 5/17/06, Darren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt,This is a problem with my builds, I sent an updated deb for Breezy toCharles. If you would like me to send it to you directly I can do that.
Starting with the next rel
Matt,
This is a problem with my builds, I sent an updated deb for Breezy to
Charles. If you would like me to send it to you directly I can do that.
Starting with the next release I will be building separate debs for
Breezy and Dapper.
Thanks!
Darren
Matt Braymiller wrote:
> Hello all:
> I am r
Hello all:I am running ubuntu 5.10 breezy at home and had been using the new pan builds up to .95 just fine. Then, through my own screw up, I had to reinstall ubuntu. Now I get an error when I try to start pan (over the last three builds). I am installing it using the .deb file that Darren provides
On Wed May 17 2006 00:16, Jeff Berman wrote:
> [...] So when I referred to that as "disturbing", I meant that it caught me
> by surprise when I started scrolling through a binaries newsgroup looking
> for stuff to download, and then all of a sudden the list resorted with new
> items both above and
Jeff Berman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Tue, 16 May 2006 21:16:02 -0700:
> [Charles Kerr wrote...]
>> 0.9x is following the trend
>> (such as in Thunderbird) of boldfacing unread articles and
>> underlining read articles that have hidden unread children.
>
Charles Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 16 May 2006
10:07:07 -0500:
> IMO the right fix is to allow users to customize
> their keystrokes.
Yea! =8^)
Good point about the confusion if other defaults are chosen, too. I don't
use that much GTK/GNOME, p
Charles Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 16 May 2006
10:07:07 -0500:
> Messing with the colors causes all kinds of headaches for people
> using different system colors, so 0.9x is following the trend
> (such as in Thunderbird) of boldfacing unread articl
On Tue, 16 May 2006 23:03:10 +0200
Vincent Favre-Nicolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Vincent,
> ftp://ftp.proxad.net/mirrors/ftp.mandriva.com/MandrivaLinux/devel/cooker/SRPMS/main/pan-0.97-1mdk.src.rpm
> rpm --rebuild pan-0.97-1mdk.src.rpm rpm
> -Uvh /usr/src/RPM/RPMS/i586/pan-0.97-0.1.20060
On Tue, 16 May 2006 23:03:10 +0200
Vincent Favre-Nicolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Vincent,
>The official Mandriva 2006 glib version is 2.8, whereas the
> development (cooker) version is 2.10. So it seems that the
> pan rpm from SoS was compiled on a machine with a cooker version.
T
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 11:03 -0700, walt wrote:
> Charles Kerr wrote:
> [...]
> > g_slice_alloc0 was introduced into glib in version 2.10, but those
> > calls are wrapped in checks to see what version of glib you've got...
>
> But the version checking is done at configure time, no? Does
> the exec
On Tue, 16 May 2006 15:06:48 -0500
Charles Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Charles,
> Well actually I guess you were right after all.
> What's probably happening is that the person rolling the RPM has
> glib 2.10, but person installing the RPM has glib 2.8, which is
> why things are effed u
20 matches
Mail list logo
