> When I click on the subject bar at the top of the header pane
> (to sort on the subject name) I get a reproducible segfault:
The attached patch should fix the crash aspect of this,
bu but
I wonder how you're getting a NULL subject here at all.
Before you apply the patch, do me a favor.
First l
As I've been looking at how I use various news servers, I find that
actually being able to have separate groupings is helpful. In 0.9x, all
servers are consolidated into a single list instead of being broken out by
news server, and I like this feature as well, but it would be helpful to
be able to
When I click on the subject bar at the top of the header pane
(to sort on the subject name) I get a reproducible segfault:
(pan:31970): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_utf8_collate_key: assertion `str !=
NULL' failed
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread -1223936320 (LWP 3
Niclas Ekstedt wrote:
Charles,
Sure I understand. Is ththe url below the right one to use
to enter this?
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pan
Yes.
Charles
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailm
By reading thru the source code I finally figured out
that pan is only *sampling* headers when opening a new
group. This behavior is entirely new to me, so I was
confused by it.
If there were, say, a third icon in the groups pane
labeled 'Get Headers' which popped up the header dialog
box then I
Brian Morrison posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below,
on Fri, 05 May 2006 13:38:36 +0100:
> You get me wrong Duncan, what I object to is *Google* claiming the right
> to the contents of Google Groups (they want to own the world right?) and
> if my stuff were in there I'd be very unhappy. I
Duncan wrote:
> Brian Morrison posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below,
> on Fri, 05 May 2006 12:33:06 +0100:
>
>> Travis wrote:
>>> More often than not the "X-No-Archive: Yes" is not recognized and is a
>>> waste of time.
>>>
>> I've always found it reliable when placed in the headers, a Go
Brian Morrison posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below,
on Fri, 05 May 2006 12:33:06 +0100:
> Travis wrote:
>>
>> More often than not the "X-No-Archive: Yes" is not recognized and is a
>> waste of time.
>>
> I've always found it reliable when placed in the headers, a Google Groups
> search
Travis wrote:
> Original Message
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> u.org] On Behalf Of Brian Morrison
> Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 00:55
> To: pan-users@nongnu.org
> Subject: [Pan-users] Custom headers in 0.95?
>
>> Charles
>>
>> Any chance of a preference for addin
Brian Morrison posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
excerpted below, on Fri, 05 May 2006 08:55:26 +0100:
> Charles
>
> Any chance of a preference for adding custom headers? I know I can type
> X-No-Archive: Yes at the top of each post, but I don't find it desperately
> exciting ;-)
Yes, please!
I don't
Charles Kerr posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Fri, 05 May 2006 02:48:14 -0500:
>> Duncan wrote:
>>> Talking about which, how does the caching work in 0.9x (second time
>>> I've asked)? I don't see a size preference.
>>>
>> Here's how I changed the cache size.
>> gui/pan.cc line 186
Charles,
Sure I understand. Is ththe url below the right one to use
to enter this?
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pan
//Niclas Ekstedt
Niclas Ekstedt, CNA/CNE/CNS/CLS/Novell Support Sysop
InfraSystems Solutions Väst AB
Tel:
Original Message
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
u.org] On Behalf Of Brian Morrison
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 00:55
To: pan-users@nongnu.org
Subject: [Pan-users] Custom headers in 0.95?
> Charles
>
> Any chance of a preference for adding custom headers? I know I can
> t
Charles
Any chance of a preference for adding custom headers? I know I can type
X-No-Archive: Yes at the top of each post, but I don't find it
desperately exciting ;-)
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5 - http://wwwkeys.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/wwwkeys.html
__
> Duncan wrote:
>> Talking about which, how does the caching work in 0.9x (second time I've
>> asked)? I don't see a size preference.
>>
> Here's how I changed the cache size.
> gui/pan.cc line 186
>
> ArticleCache cache (cache_path,100); // replace 100 with the max size in
> MB. the default is 10
15 matches
Mail list logo