> I am not sure what to make of this since on one of my computers it
> crashes and on the other it doesn't. This is using the same data. On
> the crashing computer any attempt to reply using follow-up causes a
> crash. I am attaching the pan --debug output and also a backtrace.
Looks like it's c
Lenny_Nero posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:59:44 +0100:
> Is anyone running the new c++ build on a windows 2000 box ?
>
> I have just got back on line after an Isp change, got the new code
> today and I get the same 'entry point not found' problems as I did be
> On Sunday 30 April 2006 22:06, Charles Kerr wrote:
>> So anyway, if you're trying to crash Pan, I appreciate your testing.
>> Please apply the patch, try again, and we'll continue the dance. :)
>
> Why does this remind me of a soft of mating ritual? :P
>
> And, btw, Charles... you forgot the patc
Charles Kerr wrote:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Chris's post in pan-devel)
crashes Pan for me. Windows says it has something to do with
libglib-2.0-0.dll.
Hm. I'm afraid I won't be near a Windows box with free time for a bit.
Could you run Pan inside of insight[1] and get a backtrace?
I get this muc
On 4/30/06, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin Brammer posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Sun, 30 Apr 2006 09:55:53 -1000:
> Is there a CVS tree for the 0.9x series?
Not yet (unless it's fresh up in the last 24 hours or so). I think
Charles is doing it all from his own boxen
Is anyone running the new c++ build on a windows 2000 box ?
I have just got back on line after an Isp change, got the new code
today and I get the same 'entry point not found' problems as I did before
in the late/cvs 0.14 builds.
Does this mean still no new Pan for windows 2k ?
As I have said in
walt posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Sun, 30 Apr
2006 07:26:56 -0700:
> while attempting to read the gmane.test group -- the
> article bodies were not getting fetched at all:
>
> (article-cache.cc:398 get_message): assertion "this->contains(*it)" failed.
> (article-cache.cc:398
Kevin Brammer posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Sun, 30 Apr 2006 09:55:53 -1000:
> Is there a CVS tree for the 0.9x series?
Not yet (unless it's fresh up in the last 24 hours or so). I think
Charles is doing it all from his own boxen at present, and just upping the
tarball every S
On Sunday 30 April 2006 22:06, Charles Kerr wrote:
> So anyway, if you're trying to crash Pan, I appreciate your testing.
> Please apply the patch, try again, and we'll continue the dance. :)
Why does this remind me of a soft of mating ritual? :P
And, btw, Charles... you forgot the patch :p
Jan
Attached is a patch that should help smoke out any errors with the
new Tree implementation. It also fixes the `can't read next article'
error reported a couple of times here this morning, and might also
fix the group filtering crash reported.
So anyway, if you're trying to crash Pan, I appreciate
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Chris's post in pan-devel)
> crashes Pan for me. Windows says it has something to do with
> libglib-2.0-0.dll.
Hm. I'm afraid I won't be near a Windows box with free time for a bit.
Could you run Pan inside of insight[1] and get a backtrace?
> There are still problems with
Is there a CVS tree for the 0.9x series?
___
Pan-users mailing list
Pan-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pan-users
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006 01:01:09 -0500, Charles Kerr wrote:
> If it's Sunday, it's PAN!
>
> The 0.9x series are unstable betas of a C++ rewrite of Pan that
> runs much lighter and faster, suports nzb and multiserver downloads,
> and has a cleaner user interface, all in half code size of 0.14.x.
> Eve
Charles Kerr wrote:
> 0.95 (due tomorrow) has a new option in the Edit Server dialog
> where you can designate a server as a primary or backup, so that
> the free servers can all try first, then the pay servers can fill
> in any missing pieces.
One side-effect from the change is (apparently) the
Charles Kerr wrote:
LOL! Sorry, Darren and Duncan. Is my face red. :)
lol, No worries, I was actually thinking about putting together a quick
FAQ of the common questions I see posted on this list. Maybe tomorrow
during my exciting Monday morning status call I will put something
togethe
Artur Jachacy wrote:
Doesn't build for me in Windows. Make exits with the following error:
../../uulib/libuu.a(uunconc.o): In function `UUDecode':
C:\msys\1.0\home\Artur\pan-0.94\uulib/uunconc.c:1334: undefined
reference to `mkstemp'
C:\msys\1.0\home\Artur\pan-0.94\uulib/uunconc.c:1506: undefin
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Charles Kerr wrote:
>> I'm really happy about this version, since I've spent the last
>> few evenings writing a new implementation of GtkTreeModel that
>> means more memory shaved off and decent speed improvements
>> in the group and header pane
> Charles Kerr posted
>> This is right on every count. It could serve as a de facto release FAQ.
>> And so terse for you, Duncan! ;)
> That's because it wasn't me. =8^( It was Darren Albers. You got the
> attribution mixed up somehow.
LOL! Sorry, Darren and Duncan. Is my face red. :)
___
walt wrote:
> (article-cache.cc:398 get_message): assertion "this->contains(*it)" failed.
A bit more info on this problem: I think maybe those article bodies
were not being fetched because they were crossposted to a non-existant
group and pan didn't like it. I tried double-clicking on one of th
Charles Kerr wrote:
> If it's Sunday, it's PAN!
I've had two segfaults so far. One while changing the search
string in the groups pane (so that the pane should have re-
drawn showing all groups). No error messages appeared. The
second while attempting to read the gmane.test group -- the
article
I am not sure what to make of this since on one of my computers it
crashes and on the other it doesn't. This is using the same data. On
the crashing computer any attempt to reply using follow-up causes a
crash. I am attaching the pan --debug output and also a backtrace.
--
George Sherwood
Sour
Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Charles Kerr wrote:
>> I'm really happy about this version, since I've spent the last
>> few evenings writing a new implementation of GtkTreeModel...
> Could this be affecting GTK2 builds by making navigation break. I'm a
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006, Charles Kerr wrote:
>
> 0.95 (due tomorrow) has a new option in the Edit Server dialog
> where you can designate a server as a primary or backup, so that
> the free servers can all try first, then the pay servers can fill
> in any missing pieces.
Very nice - thanks.
Unfortu
walt posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Sat, 29 Apr
2006 12:51:53 -0700:
>> Before that, the biggest problem I had was that I have an apparently
>> unusual color scheme -- light text on a dark background, and I couldn't
>> read some of the default-colored content...
>
> I hate ligh
Charles Kerr posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:48:07 -0500:
> Duncan wrote:
>
>> The current version is 0.94, but at this time Charles has not put it
>> into CVS and is doing release tarballs directly on pan.rebelbase.com.
>>
>> If I remember correctly here is h
Charles Kerr posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:54:08 -0500:
> 0.95 (due tomorrow) has a new option in the Edit Server dialog where you
> can designate a server as a primary or backup, so that the free servers
> can all try first, then the pay servers can fill in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Charles Kerr wrote:
> I'm really happy about this version, since I've spent the last
> few evenings writing a new implementation of GtkTreeModel that
> means more memory shaved off and decent speed improvements
> in the group and header panes (or, if y
27 matches
Mail list logo
