I used sysprof to take a look at where uulib spends most of its time,
and it turns out its top two bottlenecks were very tweakable.
With this tweak, the `freeze' time while Pan's decoding and saving
attachments is much shorter.
Testers, give this a spin and see what you think.
cheers,
Charles
Onl
> "Charles Kerr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>- const int diff_secs (std::max (1l, now-_time_started));
>>+ const int diff_secs (std::max ((time_t)1, now-_time_started));
>>
>>Smells like a more correct fix to me -- does it pass muster on BSD?
>
> Yeah, that's fine too (though I think the "sme
1) In the group right click context, missing is the Delete Group
Articles option. A quick way to clear the group when you're done reading
whatever articles you wanted to.
2) Still having troubles with the right click delete option in the
header pane. If there are sub-articles in the list and
Hey Guys
I need a little clarification here. I have two news servers: 1. Slow but
30+ day retention. 2. Fast but 7 day (maybe) retention. In the pre .9x
versions I would dl everything from 2 then switch to 1 and get the
rest. When I set up .93 and .94 I do fine as long as all the messages
ar
Thomas Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>On Tuesday 18 April 2006 13:09, Duncan wrote:
>
>> Note that gcc is slotted. You can therefore unmask 4.1.0 and merge it, if
>> desired, and use gcc-config/eselect to switch between versions. I /know/
>> 4.1.0 compiles it just fine -- and in less than a
"Charles Kerr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>- const int diff_secs (std::max (1l, now-_time_started));
>+ const int diff_secs (std::max ((time_t)1, now-_time_started));
>
>Smells like a more correct fix to me -- does it pass muster on BSD?
Yeah, that's fine too (though I think the "smell" is the
On Mon, 24 Apr, 2006 at 14:39 +0200, Charles Kerr wrote:
> > lines in the group and header panes have a lot of empty space in between
> > them, which seriously limits the number of lines that fit in a window
> Grumble, all right, since three people have asked for this now,
> I'll scrunch our the e
Thomas Stein posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Mon, 24 Apr 2006 14:54:07 +0200:
> On Tuesday 18 April 2006 13:09, Duncan wrote:
>
>> Note that gcc is slotted. You can therefore unmask 4.1.0 and merge it, if
>> desired, and use gcc-config/eselect to switch between versions. I /kno
On Tuesday 18 April 2006 13:09, Duncan wrote:
> Note that gcc is slotted. You can therefore unmask 4.1.0 and merge it, if
> desired, and use gcc-config/eselect to switch between versions. I /know/
> 4.1.0 compiles it just fine -- and in less than a third of a gig of
> memory, too!
Me wrote:
>
> "Charles Kerr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>It's time for your weekly Pan release. You know the drill -- lots of
>>bug fixes, a few tweaks, and a few new features. Most everything this
>>week came directly from suggestions here on pan-users, so keep up the
>>good work! :)
> socket.cc: In me
A couple of issues - for me at any rate! - with the 0.9x series
When downloading headers I see a message:
big.group.name (2)
whereas - at least in cvs - it used to say
big.group.name nn parts mm articles
I assume the '2' is the number of newsservers but it is IMHO less useful
information than t
11 matches
Mail list logo
