Am 17.04.2011 21:02, schrieb Brian McGroarty:
> If reference by asset ID is important enough that you'd want to work
> on it, lay out a proposal detailing what permissions could be baked
> into an asset at upload time, and how the permissions could be honored
> by all viewers. This would need to be
If you want to connect through your corporate network, you should talk
to the network administrator about it, they know how to do it. There are
SL versions supporting SOCKS5. About installing Second Life on corporate
PCs, talk to the system administrator about it in before, they want to
know an
libexif is LGPLv2.1 licensed, so matches the viewer license. As you just
want to write exif data only, you might take a look at exif.org and
write a simple static exif data generator from scratch.
Am 04.11.2011 10:55, schrieb Tillie Ariantho:
Hello,
so after 1 day fiddling with stuffs I got t
Is there even a requirement zo have Z-offset be in the avatar appearance
message? To me it looks more like that hip-offset would be better suited
to be in some animation parameter, which makes it incompatible with
older viewers, but a SSB-enabled simulator might translate that
animation paramet
malachi schrieb:
> im curious as to how this will apply to clients and bots that seem to
> have the ability to not only gather agents ip addresses but by obtaining
> this information raid those agents computers searching for data...
> particularly the new copybot detection system by an unmention
malachi schrieb:
> sorry thomas but the idea that a person can be detected by skills system
> while running LL's client on a name that is new today and never been
> logged in on any other client... shows that the information used to
> detect if a person has 'ever' used a bad client is coming fro
Philippe (Merov) Bossut schrieb:
> - SOCKS5: here, Robin volunteered
SOCKS5 is against the TPV Policy term
2c. You must not circumvent any security-related features or measures we
may take to limit access to Second Life. For example:
2c.i.You must not mask IP or MAC addresses.
SOCKS5 is usuall
Ryan McDougall schrieb:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Soft Linden wrote:
>
>> If you see any wording that's ambiguous about that, let us know.
>>
>
> Section 3.b.iii says that Third-party viewers must comply with the GPL
> license.
>
> What if the view is not licensed under the GPL
Morgaine schrieb:
> GPLv2 clause 6 allows no "further restrictions" to be placed on the
> freedom of developers to /"modify and distribute/" whatsoever,
> regardless of whether the USAGE of that GPL software is constrained or
> not. The GPL has no interest is how software is used to connect to
Just a quick intermezzo to stop confusion...
TPV is about Third Party Viewers... LL's viewer (not Snowglobe) will
always comply. About prohibited use, I'll assume that there will be
something added along, that features present in LL's original viewers
are allowed in TPV as well. Like exporting f
Lance Corrimal schrieb:
> /me snickers
> what was the name of this other pseudo virtual world that runs on flash
> inside
> a browser...
>
> that should work on a prim, shouldn't it?
> ___
>
Lively by Google?
_
Boroondas Gupte schrieb:
> The mini-map colors objects you own differently, so there must be
> another way to get at least owner information.
>
The server sends two bits with each prim that defines ownership.
One bit is the owner bit, it is set if the current agent owns the prim.
The other is th
Boy Lane wrote:
>
> So my question before eventually trying to dig deeper into this. Does
> the LastOwner info exist in the inventory database for any other items
> than objects? Or is that getLastOwner() function itself broken?
>
LastOwner information is only used, when deeding to group. So it
Bryon Ruxton schrieb:
> Can't we just get an additional AGENT_VIEWER flag via llGetAgentInfo?
> Even if not foolproof, it's useful as a factor for legitimate security or
> warning tools, as well as for stats gathering for 99% of residents.
> It seems like a logical solution to me, instead of having
Zabb65 schrieb:
> Channel name is a persistent saved setting. Meaning if you log in
> under a viewer that sets its channel in the saved settings file, but
> does not use one of its own(settings file), the normal viewer will
> continue to identify itself as that viewer. Until you remove the entry
Tigro Spottystripes schrieb:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> don't the user agent string already tells servers about some of the
> browser's capabilities with the current format?
>
> the current one for my Firefox is:
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; pt-BR; rv:1.9.
SuezanneC Baskerville schrieb:
> Files deleted by the SL uninstaller don't appear in the Recycle Bin
> on my Windows XP system.
>
> It seems to me it would be better if they did.
>
> Some files deleted by some other programs do appear in the Recycle Bin.
>
> In the case that brought this to my at
Just follow Microsoft requirements for Windows Logo for installation and
uninstallation on the Windows platform.
One of it is to never touch the user profile. This is a requirement for
Terminal Services Aware applications.
For removing "breadcrumbs", this is not working, an uninstaller cannot
re
18 matches
Mail list logo
