---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/616/
---
(Updated Feb. 16, 2013, 10:53 a.m.)
Review request for Viewer.
Descriptio
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/616/
---
(Updated Feb. 16, 2013, 11:44 a.m.)
Review request for Viewer.
Changes
--
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 19:44:51 -, MartinRJ Fayray wrote:
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/616/
>
> Review request for Viewer.
Yes, it seems to work more or less OK. It however still fails to animate
visible small resizing primiti
Hello Henri,
first: no I cannot reproduce the issue with small prims. They are resized in
a viewer with my fix from <0.01, 0.01, 0.01> (whis is the minimum prim size
in the LL viewer) to <0.014, 0.014, 0.014> perfectly, just exactly like in
the current SL release viewer.
This is my test scrip
Hello again, Henri,
I just tested your nipples and they work without issues in a viewer with my
fix. But they also do work in the official latest LL viewer release (Second
Life 3.4.5 (270263) Feb 12 2013 04:43:00 (Second Life Release)).
Martin RJ
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
From: Henri
Ah good thing i really dont care about this. I mean , Martin is right ,
with adding your stuff you are basically preventing it from getting
implemented but i have to say its LLs own fault because they insist on this
damn CA , really , isnt this OpenSource? doesnt OpenSource mean that
basically ever
On 17/02/2013 1:41 PM, Niran wrote:
> Ah good thing i really dont care about this. I mean , Martin is right
> , with adding your stuff you are basically preventing it from getting
> implemented but i have to say its LLs own fault because they insist on
> this damn CA , really , isnt this OpenSourc
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/616/
---
(Updated Feb. 16, 2013, 11:25 p.m.)
Review request for Viewer.
Changes
--
