Re: [opensource-dev] macOS Catalina notarization

I was able to get a successful notarization. I did not have to do anything to CEF to get it to fly, though I did have to use the --options runtime flag. We'll see what testing reveals as the effect of that. That they tightened down things as of the beginning of February explains why the notarizati

Re: [opensource-dev] macOS Catalina notarization

When it comes to deployment target, I see that in https://bitbucket.org/lindenlab/build-variables/src/master/variables which I suppose is the latest build variables used, you build with deployment target of 10.7 and with th

Re: [opensource-dev] macOS Catalina notarization

It is not only that you have unsigned libraries, but there are two other issues: 1. The Chromium Framework is not correctly structured, but must have the structure described in https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/MacOSX/Conceptual/BPFrameworks/Concepts/FrameworkAnatomy.htm

Re: [opensource-dev] macOS Catalina notarization

I've now built a VLC 3.0.8 package, and it at least allows the app to be notarized. Haven't wrung it ot yet; not sure I know how, but our beta testers will, I'm sure, let me know if it's screwed up. On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 12:18 PM Henri Beauchamp wrote: > On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 10:33:52 -0600, Ton

Re: [opensource-dev] macOS Catalina notarization

On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 10:33:52 -0600, Tonya Souther wrote: > 305 of those libraries are in llplugin, and five are in the SLvoice > for OpenSim. I don't expect that LL has anything to do with the > latter, but the former is the much bigger problem. Is the llplugin > directory still needed? My bet is