On 10/11/2010 12:44 PM, Robert Martin wrote:
> 3 "WorkingOnIt Linden"* should only have an issue assigned for maybe
> two weeks since a lot of times WorkingOnIt Linden means BlowingItOff
> Linden is actually NOT working on it.
Workingonit Linden should have never been created. "Working on it"
s
Thanks Q
>reopening because you don't like a decision is a waste of everyone's time, and
will result in temporary or permanent loss of JIRA access.
Sounds good to me.
On 10/11/10 7:44 AM, "Kent Quirk (Q Linden)" wrote:
> So we've modified the JIRA system again to allow residents to reopen issue
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Kent Quirk (Q Linden)
wrote:
> If the reason is that we can't use the issue the way it's written, then
> please don't reopen it, write a new and better one.
Just make sure on the Linden side we have a few things laid out
1 if a linden closes a jira then there sh
So we've modified the JIRA system again to allow residents to reopen issues in
VWR and STORM.
But with power comes responsibility -- we aren't going to tolerate edit wars,
and we're not going to let JIRA be a place to vent your frustrations with us or
with each other. Please keep it polite. Reo
yes we used to have the ability to reopen. and the person in question has
closed allot. so have others. its like they dont READ the issue before closing.
to the point i've considered aring them for a form of griefing
> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 14:00:24 -0700
> From: br...@slearth.com
> To: opens
