Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, 14:08:52 schrieb Stickman:
> >> Just throw the task to support. I'm sure they're not busy with anything
> >> else. :D
> >
> > I think it's important for everyone that *someone* sit down with those
> > agreements and make an effort to find where the legal rights and
> >
>> Just throw the task to support. I'm sure they're not busy with anything
>> else. :D
> I think it's important for everyone that *someone* sit down with those
> agreements and make an effort to find where the legal rights and
> provenances of the viewer code have been tainted. Who better than th
On 5/01/2011 11:57 PM, Stickman wrote:
>> what about someone from marketing, about time they did someone useful... :P
> Just throw the task to support. I'm sure they're not busy with anything else.
> :D
>
Come on folks :) Let's not take the opportunity to have a dig (though,
yes, I agree it is t
> what about someone from marketing, about time they did someone useful... :P
Just throw the task to support. I'm sure they're not busy with anything else. :D
Stickman
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, 13:44:05 schrieb Tateru Nino:
> Ideally, someone should cross-check all of the contributed patches
> against the agreements. Sounds like a good job for someone on the legal
> team.
what about someone from marketing, about time they did someone useful... :P
___
On 5/01/2011 11:39 PM, Lance Corrimal wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, 13:24:14 schrieb Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence):
>> On 2011-01-05 6:13, Lance Corrimal wrote:
>>> Isn't the acceptance of the contribution agreement automatically implied
>>> when you upload a patch to a jira?
>> Alas, no.
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, 13:24:14 schrieb Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence):
> On 2011-01-05 6:13, Lance Corrimal wrote:
> > Isn't the acceptance of the contribution agreement automatically implied
> > when you upload a patch to a jira?
>
> Alas, no. Putting a patch on jira, this list, or the coder
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, 13:24:14 schrieb Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence):
> On 2011-01-05 6:13, Lance Corrimal wrote:
> > Isn't the acceptance of the contribution agreement automatically implied
> > when you upload a patch to a jira?
>
> Alas, no. Putting a patch on jira, this list, or the coder
On 2011-01-05 6:13, Lance Corrimal wrote:
> Isn't the acceptance of the contribution agreement automatically implied when
> you upload a patch to a jira?
Alas, no. Putting a patch on jira, this list, or the codereview site
means that it falls under any agreement that you have executed, but
act
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, 01:44:15 schrieb Carlo Wood:
> One reason that it's collecting dust might be that it isn't know
> if the author of the patch signed the Contribution Argeement.
>
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:32:45PM +0100, Satomi Ahn wrote:
> > Hello and happy new year.
> >
> > I hate
One reason that it's collecting dust might be that it isn't know
if the author of the patch signed the Contribution Argeement.
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:32:45PM +0100, Satomi Ahn wrote:
> Hello and happy new year.
>
> I hate spamming this list, but there is an easy bug I'd like to see
> fixed in
Hi,
This seems spot on. Thanks Satomi.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Satomi Ahn wrote:
>
> Enough spoken, everything is there, patch included:
> https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-23712
Bug report + patch = much much love from Snowstorms maintainers :)
Cheers,
- Merov
_
12 matches
Mail list logo
