Re: [opensource-dev] LL_TESTS for standalone out-of-source builds (was: Remaining build issues for 64bit linux standalone out-of-source (without unit tests))

2010-10-12 Thread WolfPup Lowenhar
: opensource-dev-boun...@lists.secondlife.com [mailto:opensource-dev-boun...@lists.secondlife.com] On Behalf Of Boroondas Gupte Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 6:10 PM To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com Subject: [opensource-dev] LL_TESTS for standalone out-of-source builds (was: Remaining build

Re: [opensource-dev] LL_TESTS for standalone out-of-source builds

2010-10-11 Thread Boroondas Gupte
On 10/12/2010 12:21 AM, CG Linden wrote: > Yay \o/ for "daggifying" :) Done: http://bitbucket.org/boroondas/vwr-23385 Ready for review. Cheers, Boroondas ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSour

Re: [opensource-dev] LL_TESTS for standalone out-of-source builds (was: Remaining build issues for 64bit linux standalone out-of-source (without unit tests))

2010-10-11 Thread CG Linden
Yay \o/ for "daggifying" :) -- cg On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Boroondas Gupte wrote: > On 10/11/2010 10:12 PM, Boroondas Gupte wrote: > > In fact, my plan for the time after having gotten all build fixes I need > with LL_TESTS set to FALSE into viewer-development (which I hope will be > so

[opensource-dev] LL_TESTS for standalone out-of-source builds (was: Remaining build issues for 64bit linux standalone out-of-source (without unit tests))

2010-10-11 Thread Boroondas Gupte
On 10/11/2010 10:12 PM, Boroondas Gupte wrote: > In fact, my plan for the time after having gotten all build fixes I > need with LL_TESTS set to FALSE into viewer-development (which I hope > will be soon) was to set LL_TESTS back on TRUE and hunt down the > change(s) needed to build like that. (We