Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, 14:08:52 schrieb Stickman:
> >> Just throw the task to support. I'm sure they're not busy with anything
> >> else. :D
> >
> > I think it's important for everyone that *someone* sit down with those
> > agreements and make an effort to find where the legal rights and
> >
>> Just throw the task to support. I'm sure they're not busy with anything
>> else. :D
> I think it's important for everyone that *someone* sit down with those
> agreements and make an effort to find where the legal rights and
> provenances of the viewer code have been tainted. Who better than th
On 5/01/2011 11:57 PM, Stickman wrote:
>> what about someone from marketing, about time they did someone useful... :P
> Just throw the task to support. I'm sure they're not busy with anything else.
> :D
>
Come on folks :) Let's not take the opportunity to have a dig (though,
yes, I agree it is t
> what about someone from marketing, about time they did someone useful... :P
Just throw the task to support. I'm sure they're not busy with anything else. :D
Stickman
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, 13:44:05 schrieb Tateru Nino:
> Ideally, someone should cross-check all of the contributed patches
> against the agreements. Sounds like a good job for someone on the legal
> team.
what about someone from marketing, about time they did someone useful... :P
___
On 5/01/2011 11:39 PM, Lance Corrimal wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, 13:24:14 schrieb Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence):
>> On 2011-01-05 6:13, Lance Corrimal wrote:
>>> Isn't the acceptance of the contribution agreement automatically implied
>>> when you upload a patch to a jira?
>> Alas, no.
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, 13:24:14 schrieb Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence):
> On 2011-01-05 6:13, Lance Corrimal wrote:
> > Isn't the acceptance of the contribution agreement automatically implied
> > when you upload a patch to a jira?
>
> Alas, no. Putting a patch on jira, this list, or the coder
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, 13:24:14 schrieb Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence):
> On 2011-01-05 6:13, Lance Corrimal wrote:
> > Isn't the acceptance of the contribution agreement automatically implied
> > when you upload a patch to a jira?
>
> Alas, no. Putting a patch on jira, this list, or the coder
On 2011-01-05 6:13, Lance Corrimal wrote:
> Isn't the acceptance of the contribution agreement automatically implied when
> you upload a patch to a jira?
Alas, no. Putting a patch on jira, this list, or the codereview site
means that it falls under any agreement that you have executed, but
act
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, 01:44:15 schrieb Carlo Wood:
> One reason that it's collecting dust might be that it isn't know
> if the author of the patch signed the Contribution Argeement.
>
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:32:45PM +0100, Satomi Ahn wrote:
> > Hello and happy new year.
> >
> > I hate
One reason that it's collecting dust might be that it isn't know
if the author of the patch signed the Contribution Argeement.
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:32:45PM +0100, Satomi Ahn wrote:
> Hello and happy new year.
>
> I hate spamming this list, but there is an easy bug I'd like to see
> fixed in
Hi,
This seems spot on. Thanks Satomi.
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:32 AM, Satomi Ahn wrote:
>
> Enough spoken, everything is there, patch included:
> https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-23712
Bug report + patch = much much love from Snowstorms maintainers :)
Cheers,
- Merov
_
Hello and happy new year.
I hate spamming this list, but there is an easy bug I'd like to see
fixed in the viewer, and which seems to have been only taking dust in
the JIRA for two entire months.
This is about one of the bugs who contribute to the general feeling of
sluggishness in Viewer 2, so I
13 matches
Mail list logo
