Hello Aleric,
I’m sorry you don’t understand this fix at all.
In short: other cases like the one you mentioned
>still fail to reach the final scale
will be treated in other parts of the code and are parts of other if/else
conditions.
MartinRJ
From: Aleric Inglewood
Sent: Monday, February 18,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/617/#review1301
---
I don't understand this "fix" at ALL. It doesn't seem to make any
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:44:21 +0100, Henri Beauchamp wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 03:02:40 -, MartinRJ Fayray wrote:
>
> > I fixed that by comparing the original scale versus the new target
> > scale (instead of comparing the original scale versus the new
> > interpolated target scale), in lld
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 03:02:40 -, MartinRJ Fayray wrote:
> I fixed that by comparing the original scale versus the new target
> scale (instead of comparing the original scale versus the new
> interpolated target scale), in lldrawable.cpp "updateXform" to decide
> whether a scale change requires
I posted a copy of the test plan for both codereviews (BUG-1709 and BUG-840) at
the Firestorm – Jira:
http://jira.phoenixviewer.com/browse/FIRE-8279?focusedCommentId=105648&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-105648
MartinRJ
From: MartinRJ Fayray
Sent:
