On 12/10/2012 7:25 PM, Nicky Perian wrote:
> At the sldev meeting earlier it was stated that unicode processing with
> boost regex was problematic unless a shared boost lib was included.
> Here:
> http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_52_0/libs/regex/doc/html/boost_regex/unicode.html
> it appears that t
At the sldev meeting earlier it was stated that unicode processing with boost
regex was problematic unless a shared boost lib was included.
Here: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_52_0/libs/regex/doc/html/boost_regex/unicode.html
it appears that the static lib compiled/linked with ICU is unicode aw
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/604/
---
(Updated Dec. 10, 2012, 1:53 p.m.)
Review request for Viewer.
Changes
---
On Sun, 9 Dec 2012 18:32:18 -0800 (PST), Nicky Perian wrote:
> What is the reason for the switch to boost shared libraries?
>
> The other platforms seem to perform without issue using boost static
> libraries.
Apart from adding 20Mb of shared libraries (boost regexp) to the viewer
package ?...
Yes, 3.4.3
No problem with LL v-d(1.52) or v-b(1.48). I build a 64 bit viewer for kokua
and built it w/o the *.so but, did not link icu to the viewer. It built and
runs Ok "i think". Just may not have reached the code where it it is needed.
From Oz meeting this morning the shared libs are for bo
On 12/9/2012 9:32 PM, Nicky Perian wrote:
>
> What is the reason for the switch to boost shared libraries?
>
> The other platforms seem to perform without issue using boost static
> libraries.
In 3.4.3? That change was picked up as part of some shared work
in Boost packaging. Not certain what th
