Re: [opensource-dev] FUI project just out - no more sidebar

Am Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2011 schrieb Ardy Lay: > > why the eff are those buttons on the left instead of the right > > where we all would expect them to be after around 2 years of > > sidebar? > > MOVE the effing buttons yourself! It's easy, really. doesn't change the fact that they should no

Re: [opensource-dev] FUI project just out - no more sidebar

On 10/19/2011 12:41 AM, Lance Corrimal wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2011 schrieb Jonathan Welch: >> The new FUI project just got merged in to viewer-development. No >> more sidebar! Attached you can see there are buttons on the >> bottom and left. There's also a column you can move them to

Re: [opensource-dev] FUI project just out - no more sidebar

Am Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2011 schrieb Jonathan Welch: > The new FUI project just got merged in to viewer-development. No > more sidebar! Attached you can see there are buttons on the > bottom and left. There's also a column you can move them to on > the right which starts out unpopulated. For e

Re: [opensource-dev] Viewer UI mode merge

On 2011-10-18 18:04, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: Today the Viewer UI mode merge project is coming to viewer-development. This project combines basic and advanced modes and brings an updated, more flexible workspace to the Viewer. At the time of integration with viewer-deve

Re: [opensource-dev] Viewer UI mode merge

I agree completely with Arrehn myself, communication with the community is awesome when trying to achieve a UI intended to work for *most* people. That said, my two cents on the new UI: Why are IMs docked at the top? It seems like it'd make more sense for them to be docked at the bottom. Window

Re: [opensource-dev] Viewer UI mode merge

Agreed on all points made by Arrehn. _ From: opensource-dev-boun...@lists.secondlife.com [mailto:opensource-dev-boun...@lists.secondlife.com] On Behalf Of Arrehn Oberlander Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 10:20 PM To: Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) Cc: Viewer Subject: Re: [opensource-dev]

Re: [opensource-dev] FUI project just out - no more sidebar

Dude! For serious? That's just the kind of thing that could inspire me to fix my computer so i can try the v3 viewer and start spending some quality time in SL doing something other than just meditating at the Buddha Center! i mean, the meditating is good & all that, & it's not like it doesn't m

Re: [opensource-dev] Viewer UI mode merge

On 10/18/2011 7:20 PM, Arrehn Oberlander wrote: > Thanks for sharing Oz, > > Although I like the general direction of the improvements and believe > they have good potential, I feel the obligation to point out to your own > presentation with Esbee and Qarl two years ago coming off of the > difficu

Re: [opensource-dev] Viewer UI mode merge

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 My top annoyances on first impressions: No Map button by default, and no ctrl+M shortcut at all. Can't relocate the chiclets syswell, or at least reduce the standoff from the corner. I use that corner exclusively for the minimap, which has always made

Re: [opensource-dev] Viewer UI mode merge

Thanks for sharing Oz, Although I like the general direction of the improvements and believe they have good potential, I feel the obligation to point out to your own presentation with Esbee and Qarl two years ago coming off of the difficult Viewer 2 rollout, where the three of you stood up before

Re: [opensource-dev] FUI project just out - no more sidebar

I can't be the only one who thinks that window management needs to be re-thought for FUI. As it stands, it seems as if that actually took a step backwards. On Oct 18, 2011, at 10:03 PM, Jonathan Welch wrote: > The new FUI project just got merged in to viewer-development. No more > sidebar! At

[opensource-dev] Viewer UI mode merge

Today the Viewer UI mode merge project is coming to viewer-development. This project combines basic and advanced modes and brings an updated, more flexible workspace to the Viewer. At the time of integration with viewer-development today, there are still a number of outstanding iss

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: STORM-1615 Please update language support for Viewer

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/490/#review1059 --- Ship it! - Oz On Oct. 11, 2011, 10:48 a.m., Vadim ProductEngin

Re: [opensource-dev] Eliminate VS2010 LNK4099 errors

Deliver the *pdb files with each library as is done with vorbis_static within 3p-ogvorbis' build-cmd.sh. From: Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2011 10:54 AM Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Eliminate VS

Re: [opensource-dev] Eliminate VS2010 LNK4099 errors

On 2011-10-17 20:41, Jonathan Welch wrote: > I've got tired of seeing blasts of LNK4099 errors fly up the screen > when I compile so I looked into how to eliminate them. It seems the > only way to do this is to hack link.exe and change the 4 bytes that > equal 4099 to something else. See > http:/

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: STORM-959 Syntax highlighting for LSL multi-line comments.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/498/#review1058 --- indra/llui/llkeywords.h

[opensource-dev] Review Request: Add experimental support for building with Xcode 4.2 on Mac OS X Lion

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/502/ --- Review request for Viewer. Summary --- Check the version of Xcode inst