Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: STORM-829 Viewer 2 does not parse /me in object Instant Messages

2011-01-05 Thread Wolfpup Lowenhar
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/71/#review114 --- Ship it! indra/newview/llviewermessage.cpp

[opensource-dev] Review Request: STORM-829 Viewer 2 does not parse /me in object Instant Messages

2011-01-05 Thread Jonathan Yap
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/71/ --- Review request for Viewer. Summary --- The "/me" in the lsl code below

Re: [opensource-dev] Very Strange occurrence...

2011-01-05 Thread Simon Quinnell
I vote for Hippo Linden! On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Kent Quirk (Q Linden) wrote: > So the reason that semi-plausible strings are used for these things is that > they're the only strings available when we use the test floater feature from > the login screen. > > But we should probably try not

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: (STORM-550) LLDir::getNextFileInDir fails for some complex wildcard combinations

2011-01-05 Thread Seth ProductEngine
> On Jan. 5, 2011, 11:34 a.m., Oz Linden wrote: > > Just one policy question with this... > > > > This implementation uses llwarns for various errors in the glob expression. > > > > Given that I expect that the glob expression will normally (always?) be > > hard coded (I hope no one will accep

Re: [opensource-dev] Very Strange occurrence...

2011-01-05 Thread Kent Quirk (Q Linden)
So the reason that semi-plausible strings are used for these things is that they're the only strings available when we use the test floater feature from the login screen. But we should probably try not to use real names. And yes, Jonathan, these should mostly never be visible. But sometimes thi

[opensource-dev] Daily Scrum Update - Wednesday, January 5, 2011

2011-01-05 Thread Anya Kanevsky
Wednesday, January 5, 2011 General Notes -- - Reminder to devs. If a ticket doesn't pass Review and is rejected, it will move back to the To Do column in GH, if you do more work or clarify questions, it should be moved back through In Progress and then to In

Re: [opensource-dev] build 218026 silently failing

2011-01-05 Thread Erin Mallory
I don't think its just you twisted. Ive seen this on 3 differant windows computers with the build i mentioned. From: twisted_l...@hotmail.com To: me...@lindenlab.com; opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 13:42:36 -0500 Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] build 218026 silently fa

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: (STORM-550) LLDir::getNextFileInDir fails for some complex wildcard combinations

2011-01-05 Thread Oz Linden
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/32/#review112 --- Just one policy question with this... This implementation uses llw

Re: [opensource-dev] build 218026 silently failing

2011-01-05 Thread Twisted Laws
I may have seen this on around 4 occasions while in the sandboxes over the last month. I've always assumed it was a bad object and immediately logged back in and ran in the debugger but it didn't re-occur. Its just a poof and its gone with nothing useful in the log files. My builds are a dai

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: (STORM-550) LLDir::getNextFileInDir fails for some complex wildcard combinations

2011-01-05 Thread Oz Linden
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/32/ --- (Updated Jan. 5, 2011, 8:33 a.m.) Review request for Viewer. Changes -

[opensource-dev] Review Request: STORM-826 (partial): fix line endings in files that use a mix of CRLF and LF

2011-01-05 Thread Oz Linden
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/70/ --- Review request for Viewer. Summary --- This is a simple change to corre

Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory incremental search (VWR-23712)

2011-01-05 Thread Lance Corrimal
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, 14:08:52 schrieb Stickman: > >> Just throw the task to support. I'm sure they're not busy with anything > >> else. :D > > > > I think it's important for everyone that *someone* sit down with those > > agreements and make an effort to find where the legal rights and > >

Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory incremental search (VWR-23712)

2011-01-05 Thread Stickman
>> Just throw the task to support. I'm sure they're not busy with anything >> else. :D > I think it's important for everyone that *someone* sit down with those > agreements and make an effort to find where the legal rights and > provenances of the viewer code have been tainted. Who better than th

Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory incremental search (VWR-23712)

2011-01-05 Thread Tateru Nino
On 5/01/2011 11:57 PM, Stickman wrote: >> what about someone from marketing, about time they did someone useful... :P > Just throw the task to support. I'm sure they're not busy with anything else. > :D > Come on folks :) Let's not take the opportunity to have a dig (though, yes, I agree it is t

Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory incremental search (VWR-23712)

2011-01-05 Thread Stickman
> what about someone from marketing, about time they did someone useful... :P Just throw the task to support. I'm sure they're not busy with anything else. :D Stickman ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com

Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory incremental search (VWR-23712)

2011-01-05 Thread Lance Corrimal
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, 13:44:05 schrieb Tateru Nino: > Ideally, someone should cross-check all of the contributed patches > against the agreements. Sounds like a good job for someone on the legal > team. what about someone from marketing, about time they did someone useful... :P ___

Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory incremental search (VWR-23712)

2011-01-05 Thread Tateru Nino
On 5/01/2011 11:39 PM, Lance Corrimal wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, 13:24:14 schrieb Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence): >> On 2011-01-05 6:13, Lance Corrimal wrote: >>> Isn't the acceptance of the contribution agreement automatically implied >>> when you upload a patch to a jira? >> Alas, no.

Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory incremental search (VWR-23712)

2011-01-05 Thread Lance Corrimal
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, 13:24:14 schrieb Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence): > On 2011-01-05 6:13, Lance Corrimal wrote: > > Isn't the acceptance of the contribution agreement automatically implied > > when you upload a patch to a jira? > > Alas, no. Putting a patch on jira, this list, or the coder

Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory incremental search (VWR-23712)

2011-01-05 Thread Lance Corrimal
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, 13:24:14 schrieb Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence): > On 2011-01-05 6:13, Lance Corrimal wrote: > > Isn't the acceptance of the contribution agreement automatically implied > > when you upload a patch to a jira? > > Alas, no. Putting a patch on jira, this list, or the coder

Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory incremental search (VWR-23712)

2011-01-05 Thread Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
On 2011-01-05 6:13, Lance Corrimal wrote: > Isn't the acceptance of the contribution agreement automatically implied when > you upload a patch to a jira? Alas, no. Putting a patch on jira, this list, or the codereview site means that it falls under any agreement that you have executed, but act

Re: [opensource-dev] Inventory incremental search (VWR-23712)

2011-01-05 Thread Lance Corrimal
Am Mittwoch, 5. Januar 2011, 01:44:15 schrieb Carlo Wood: > One reason that it's collecting dust might be that it isn't know > if the author of the patch signed the Contribution Argeement. > > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:32:45PM +0100, Satomi Ahn wrote: > > Hello and happy new year. > > > > I hate