Hi Chuck,
I've revived my Quantity PRs that use __numpy_ufunc__ but is it
correct that at present in *dev, one cannot use it?
All the best,
Marten
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/nump
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Marten van Kerkwijk <
m.h.vankerkw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Chuck,
>
> I've revived my Quantity PRs that use __numpy_ufunc__ but is it
> correct that at present in *dev, one cannot use it?
>
It's not enabled yet.
Chuck
__
Recall that I think we wanted to rename this to __array_ufunc__, so we
could change the function signature:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/5986
I'm still a little nervous about this. Chunk -- what is your proposal for
resolving the outstanding issues from
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issu
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Stephan Hoyer wrote:
> Recall that I think we wanted to rename this to __array_ufunc__, so we
> could change the function signature: https://github.com/numpy/
> numpy/issues/5986
>
> I'm still a little nervous about this. Chunk -- what is your proposal for
> reso
Hi Chuck,
> We were pretty close. IIRC, the outstanding issue was some sort of override.
Correct. With a general sentiment of those downstream that it would be
great to merge in any form, as it will be really helpful! (Generic
speedup of factor of 2 for computationally expensive ufuncs (sin, cos,
