On 12.05.2016 02:02, Sturla Molden wrote:
Feng Yu wrote:
1. If we are talking about shared memory and copy-on-write
inheritance, then we are using 'fork'.
Not available on Windows. On Unix it only allows one-way communication,
from parent to child.
Apparently next Win10 will have fork as p
I am pleased to announce release 2016.2 of SfePy.
Description
---
SfePy (simple finite elements in Python) is a software for solving systems of
coupled partial differential equations by the finite element method or by the
isogeometric analysis (preliminary support). It is distributed und
Hi,
On behalf of the scipy development team, I'm pleased to announce the
availability of scipy 0.17.1.
This is a bugfix release with no new features compared to 0.17.0.
Source tarballs and OS X wheels are available from PyPI or from GitHub
releases at https://github.com/scipy/scipy/releases/tag/
On Thu, 12 May 2016 06:27:43 + (UTC)
Sturla Molden wrote:
> Allan Haldane wrote:
>
> > You probably already know this, but I just wanted to note that the
> > mpi4py module has worked around pickle too. They discuss how they
> > efficiently transfer numpy arrays in mpi messages here:
> > htt
> Again, not everyone uses Unix.
>
> And on Unix it is not trival to pass data back from the child process. I
> solved that problem with Sys V IPC (pickling the name of the segment).
>
I wonder if it is neccessary insist being able to pass large amount of data
back from child to the parent process
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Can you define "expensive"?
Slow enough to cause complaints on the Cython mailing list.
> You're assuming this is the cost of "buffer acquisition", while most
> likely it's the cost of creating the memoryview object itself.
Constructing a typed memoryview from a typed m
Niki Spahiev wrote:
> Apparently next Win10 will have fork as part of bash integration.
That would be great. The lack of fork on Windows is very annoying.
Sturla
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
https://mail.scipy.org/mail
Antoine Pitrou pitrou.net> writes:
>
> On Thu, 12 May 2016 06:27:43 + (UTC)
> Sturla Molden gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Allan Haldane gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > You probably already know this, but I just wanted to note that the
> > > mpi4py module has worked around pickle too. They discuss
Feng Yu wrote:
> In most (half?) situations the result can be directly write back via
> preallocated shared array before works are spawned. Then there is no
> need to pass data back with named segments.
You can work around it in various ways, this being one of them.
Personally I prefer a paral
