Is this the point when scikit-learn should build against it?
Or do we wait for an RC?
Also, we need a scipy build against it. Who does that?
Our continuous integration doesn't usually build scipy or numpy, so it
will be a bit tricky to add to our config.
Would you run our master tests? [did we e
You most likely don't need a scipy build against it. You should be able
to use the oldest scipy our project supports. Numpy does try to not
break its reverse dependencies, if stuff breaks it should only occur in
edge cases not affecting functionality of real applications (like
warnings or overzealo
On Jan 29, 2016 9:46 AM, "Andreas Mueller" wrote:
>
> Is this the point when scikit-learn should build against it?
Yes please!
> Or do we wait for an RC?
This is still all in flux, but I think we might actually want a rule that
says it can't become an RC until after we've tested scikit-learn (a
