>
> Also, am I correct that these are win64 builds only? Anyone know if it
> would be easy to add win32?
>
It'd be really easy to add 32 bit builds. The main reason I didn't was
because appveyor only
gives one concurrent build job for free, and I didn't want to slow things
down too much. I can get
>
> The Python 3 build runs much faster than the Python 2. You can close and
>> reopen my testing PR to check what happens if you enable the numpy project.
>
>
I'm not sure why this is the case. MSVC 2015 is generally better about a
lot of things, but it's
surprising that the speed difference is so
Why, why, why is it not the empty string. you can't actually fill an `S2`
type with such a string, hence one must convert masked string arrays to a
list of strings to use it. That is pathetic.
Chuck
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scip
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Ralf Gommers
>
> +1 from me. Despite the number of downloads still being high, I don't
> think there's too much value in these binaries anymore.
>
If there are a lot of downloads, then there is value. At least until we
have binary wheels on PyPi.
What's up with th
Hi all,
I submitted a PR (#6872) for using complex numbers in np.lib.interp.
The tests pass on my machine, but I see that the TravisCI builds are
giving assertion fails (on my own test) with python 3.3 and 3.5 of the
form:
> assert_almost_equal
> TypeError: Cannot cast array data from dtype('compl
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Chris Barker
wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Ralf Gommers
>>
>> +1 from me. Despite the number of downloads still being high, I don't
>> think there's too much value in these binaries anymore.
>>
>
> If there are a lot of downloads, then there is value.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:55 AM, Peter Creasey <
p.e.creasey...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I submitted a PR (#6872) for using complex numbers in np.lib.interp.
>
> The tests pass on my machine, but I see that the TravisCI builds are
> giving assertion fails (on my own test) with python 3.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 7:42 PM, Ian Henriksen <
insertinterestingnameh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also, am I correct that these are win64 builds only? Anyone know if it
>> would be easy to add win32?
>>
>
> It'd be really easy to add 32 bit builds. The main reason I didn't was
> because appveyor only
