On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:33 PM, Charles R Harris
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Charles R Harris
>> wrote:
>> >
>> [...]
>> > I gave it a shot the other day. Pip keeps a record of the path to the
>> > repo
>> > and
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> [...]
> > I believe that this would also break both 'easy_install numpy', and
> > attempts to install numpy via the setup_requires= argument to
> > setuptools.setup (because setup_
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> [...]
>> > I believe that this would also break both 'easy_install numpy', and
>> > attempts to install numpy via t
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias
wrote:
> Is there a pip equivalent of "python setup.py develop"?
Kinda answered this already when replying to Chuck, but: yes, it's
`pip install -e ` (the -e is short for
--editable), not that you would need it necessarily because `setup.py
de
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Ralf Gommers
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> > I believe that this would al
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 3:32 AM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 12:19 AM, Ralf Gommers
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 9:31 PM, N
Apparently it is not well known that if you have a Python project
source tree (e.g., a numpy checkout), then the correct way to install
it is NOT to type
python setup.py install # bad and broken!
but rather to type
pip install .
Though I haven't studied it exhaustively, it always seem
FWIW, when I needed a fast Fixed Width reader for a very large dataset last
year, I found that np.genfromtext() was faster than pandas' read_fwf().
IIRC, pandas' text reading code fell back to pure python for fixed width
scenarios.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal <
chr
I'm sorry if this is out-of-topic, but I'm curious on why nobody mentioned
Conda yet.
Is there any particular reason for not using it?
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:48 AM, James E.H. Turner
wrote:
> Apparently it is not well known that if you have a Python project
>> source tree (e.g., a numpy che
Conda is for binary installs and largely targeted for end-users. This topic
pertains to source installs, and is mostly relevant to developers, testers,
and those who like to live on the bleeding edge of a particular project.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Edison Gustavo Muenz <
edisongust...@gm
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Edison Gustavo Muenz <
edisongust...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm sorry if this is out-of-topic, but I'm curious on why nobody mentioned
> Conda yet.
>
Conda is a binary distribution system, whereas we are talking about
installing from sources. You will need a way to i
On Oct 27, 2015 6:08 AM, wrote:
>
[...]
>
>
> What's the equivalent of
> python setup.py build_ext --inplace
It's
python setup.py build_ext --inplace
;-)
There's also no replacement for setup.py sdist, or setup.py upload (which
is broken and should never be used), or setup.py clean (which i
On Oct 27, 2015 6:48 AM, "James E.H. Turner" wrote:
>>
>> Apparently it is not well known that if you have a Python project
>> source tree (e.g., a numpy checkout), then the correct way to install
>> it is NOT to type
>>
>>python setup.py install # bad and broken!
>>
>> but rather to type
>>
Interestingly, conda actually does "setup.py install" in the recipe for
numpy:
https://github.com/conda/conda-recipes/blob/master/numpy-openblas/build.sh
I'm not sure if this is the one they use to build the anaconda package, I
think they have internal versions of most of the recipes on conda-reci
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Oct 27, 2015 6:08 AM, wrote:
> >
> [...]
> >
> >
> > What's the equivalent of
> > python setup.py build_ext --inplace
>
> It's
> python setup.py build_ext --inplace
>
> ;-)
>
Ok, Sorry, I read now the small print and the issue.
S
Would this happen at the level of numpy's setup.py script or would it be
implemented in numpy.distutils? I'm asking as the developer of a package
that uses numpy.distutils to manage C extensions.
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:28 AM, wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Nathaniel Smith wr
On Oct 27, 2015 8:34 AM, "Nathan Goldbaum" wrote:
>
> Would this happen at the level of numpy's setup.py script or would it be
implemented in numpy.distutils? I'm asking as the developer of a package
that uses numpy.distutils to manage C extensions.
NumPy's setup.py, no effect on numpy.distutils
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 4:28 PM, wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
>> On Oct 27, 2015 6:08 AM, wrote:
>> >
>> [...]
>> >
>> >
>> > What's the equivalent of
>> > python setup.py build_ext --inplace
>>
>> It's
>> python setup.py build_ext --inplace
>>
>
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
Updating this list for comments made after I sent it and now that I've
looked in more detail at what the less common commands do:
> So if/when we accept the proposal in this thread, I'm thinking we should
> make a bunch of changes at once:
>
Can someone here who understands more about distribution maybe write a blog
post detailing:
- why these setup.py commands are bad
- which alternative corresponds to each command and why it's better
- where to find information about this
For example, I had never heard of "twine", and pare
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias
wrote:
> Can someone here who understands more about distribution maybe write a
> blog post detailing:
>
> - why these setup.py commands are bad
> - which alternative corresponds to each command and why it's better
> - where to find informatio
Thanks Ralf! The pointer to Python Packaging User Guide is already gold! (But a
wider discussion e.g. in the NumPy repo, mirroring the docstring conventions,
would also be good!)
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Ralf Gommers
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Juan Nunez-Iglesias
> wr
22 matches
Mail list logo
