Very funny ! š
Le 25 sept. 2015 07:53, "Alexander EberspƤcher"
a Ć©crit :
> On 24.09.2015 21:12, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
> > I find Cleve Moler's old Fortran version of Brent's zero finding
> > algorithm using gotos clearer than the structured versions you can find
> > in Numerical Recipes. The
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:45 AM, David Cournapeau wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Sebastian Berg
> wrote:
>>
[...]
>> About using the commit log to seed, I think there are some old term
>> contributers (David Cournapeau maybe?), who never stopped doing quite a
>> bit but may not hav
[Travis: sorry for writing all this referring to you in third person
-- I guess it might feel a bit awkward to read! You're certainly part
of the intended audience, but then it felt even more awkward trying to
write in second person... this is clearly a bug in English.]
Hi all,
On Wed, Sep 23, 20
To respond to the devils advocate:
Creating this organizational framework is a one time boot-strapping
event. You could use wording like "The initial council will include those
who have made significant contributions to numpy in the past and want to be
on it" or "The initial council will be cons
Hi Nathaniel,
Piping in again from the outside: being on council would certainly seem to
be a job not a privilege, and I suspect it will be hard enough to find
people willing to actually put in work to worry about restricting
membership overly.
Given this, my suggestion would be to have a general
On Mi, 2015-09-23 at 19:48 -0500, Travis Oliphant wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Charles R Harris
> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:42 PM, Chris Barker
> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Travis Oliphant
>
> On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:53 AM, Alexander EberspƤcher
> wrote:
>
> On 24.09.2015 21:12, Charles R Harris wrote:
>
>> I find Cleve Moler's old Fortran version of Brent's zero finding
>> algorithm using gotos clearer than the structured versions you can find
>> in Numerical Recipes. The operation
goto! and comefrom! Together with exceptions, threads, lambda, super,
generators, and coroutines, all we're lacking is
call-with-current-continuation for the full list of impenetrable
control-flow constructs. Oh, and lisp-style resumable exception handling.
(Suggested syntax: drop(exception, value)
Ow! Ow! Ow! I am just a meteorologist that has an obsession with looking up
unfamiliar technology terms.
I need a Tylenol...
Ben Root
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Anne Archibald
wrote:
> goto! and comefrom! Together with exceptions, threads, lambda, super,
> generators, and coroutines, all
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Anne Archibald
wrote:
> goto! and comefrom! Together with exceptions, threads, lambda, super,
> generators, and coroutines, all we're lacking is
> call-with-current-continuation for the full list of impenetrable
> control-flow constructs. Oh, and lisp-style resum
Hello,
I am attempting to set up a numpy.distutils setup.py for a small python program
that uses a Fortran module. Currently, the setup is able to compile and install
the program seemingly successfully, but the f2py script erroneously maps the
data types I am using to float, rather than double.
Does anybody know what happened to the following links on the NumPy
homepage (http://www.numpy.org/):
- http://wiki.scipy.org/Wiki/NumPy_for_Matlab_Users
- http://www.numpy.org/
- http://wiki.scipy.org/Numpy_Functions_by_Category
They have not been available for some time now ...
__
On Sep 25, 2015 11:06 AM, "Charles R Harris"
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Anne Archibald
wrote:
>>
>> goto! and comefrom! Together with exceptions, threads, lambda, super,
generators, and coroutines, all we're lacking is
call-with-current-continuation for the full list of impe
The wiki is down, presumably as part of this:
https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/6325
On Sep 25, 2015 1:22 PM, "Thomas Haslwanter"
wrote:
> Does anybody know what happened to the following links on the NumPy
> homepage (http://www.numpy.org/):
>
>
>- http://wiki.scipy.org/Wiki/NumPy_for_
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>
> The coroutines in 3.5 are just syntactic sugar around features that were
> added in *2*.5 (yield expressions and yield from), so no need to wait :-).
> They fall far short of arbitrary continuations, though.
>
Correction: Python 3.4 gain
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 2:39 PM, Ryan May wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> The coroutines in 3.5 are just syntactic sugar around features that were
>> added in *2*.5 (yield expressions and yield from), so no need to wait :-).
>> They fall far short of arbit
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Marten van Kerkwijk
wrote:
[...]
>
> p.s. Independently of rules, I don't see how Travis would not qualify even
> from current work, given that he has just committed to actively try to
> improve/generalize dtype.
Just to clarify what's happening here (at least as
17 matches
Mail list logo
