Re: [Numpy-discussion] Subclassing ma.masked_array, code broken after version 1.9

2016-02-15 Thread Charles R Harris
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Gutenkunst, Ryan N - (rgutenk) < rgut...@email.arizona.edu> wrote: > Thank Jonathan, > > Good to confirm this isn't something inappropriate I'm doing. I give up > transparency here in my application, so I'll just work around it. I leave > it up to wiser numpy head

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Subclassing ma.masked_array, code broken after version 1.9

2016-02-15 Thread Sebastian Berg
On Mo, 2016-02-15 at 17:06 +, Gutenkunst, Ryan N - (rgutenk) wrote: > Thank Jonathan, > > Good to confirm this isn't something inappropriate I'm doing. I give > up transparency here in my application, so I'll just work around it. > I leave it up to wiser numpy heads as to whether it's worth al

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Subclassing ma.masked_array, code broken after version 1.9

2016-02-15 Thread Gutenkunst, Ryan N - (rgutenk)
Thank Jonathan, Good to confirm this isn't something inappropriate I'm doing. I give up transparency here in my application, so I'll just work around it. I leave it up to wiser numpy heads as to whether it's worth altering these numpy.ma functions to enable subclassing. Best, Ryan On Feb 13,

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Subclassing ma.masked_array, code broken after version 1.9

2016-02-13 Thread Jonathan Helmus
On 2/12/16 6:06 PM, Gutenkunst, Ryan N - (rgutenk) wrote: Hello all, In 2009 I developed an application that uses a subclass of masked arrays as a central data object. My subclass Spectrum possesses additional attributes along with many custom methods. It was very convenient to be able to us