Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.10.3 release.

2016-01-06 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Ralf Gommers wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> The failed tests require pyrex, fortran, and swig. The refcount error >> comes and goes, probably the test isn't very good. Ralf, is there a

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.10.3 release.

2016-01-05 Thread Ralf Gommers
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:38 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > The failed tests require pyrex, fortran, and swig. The refcount error > comes and goes, probably the test isn't very good. Ralf, is there any > reason to keep the various extension building tests? They are very old. > There are f2py t

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.10.3 release.

2016-01-04 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 10:05 PM, wrote: > On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > A significant segfault problem has been reported against Numpy 1.10.2 > and I > > want to make a quick 1.10.3 release to get it fixed. Two questions > > > > What exactly is the

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.10.3 release.

2016-01-03 Thread josef.pktd
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 12:05 AM, wrote: > On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> A significant segfault problem has been reported against Numpy 1.10.2 and I >> want to make a quick 1.10.3 release to get it fixed. Two questions >> >> What exactly is the release

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.10.3 release.

2016-01-02 Thread josef.pktd
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > A significant segfault problem has been reported against Numpy 1.10.2 and I > want to make a quick 1.10.3 release to get it fixed. Two questions > > What exactly is the release process that has been decided on? AFAIK, I > should

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.10.3 release.

2016-01-02 Thread Matthew Brett
On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Charles R Harris wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Matthew Brett > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Charles R Harris >> wrote: >> > Hi All, >> > >> > A significant segfault problem has been reported against Numpy 1.10.2 >> > and I

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.10.3 release.

2016-01-02 Thread Charles R Harris
On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Matthew Brett wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Charles R Harris > wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > A significant segfault problem has been reported against Numpy 1.10.2 > and I > > want to make a quick 1.10.3 release to get it fixed. Two questions > > >

Re: [Numpy-discussion] Numpy 1.10.3 release.

2016-01-02 Thread Matthew Brett
Hi, On Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Charles R Harris wrote: > Hi All, > > A significant segfault problem has been reported against Numpy 1.10.2 and I > want to make a quick 1.10.3 release to get it fixed. Two questions > > What exactly is the release process that has been decided on? AFAIK, I > s