Correct, however other areas of the application expect an empty list to be
present, otherwise I would have used None.
2009/1/26 Matthieu Brucher
> 2009/1/26 Hanni Ali :
> > Yes fair point, but when it's a empty list and new elements are replaced
> > with a new list instance it's fine, especially
2009/1/26 Hanni Ali :
> Yes fair point, but when it's a empty list and new elements are replaced
> with a new list instance it's fine, especially as [[]]*10 is
> significantly faster than [[] for i in xrange(10)] as I was previously
> doing.
In this case, why do you put a list in it in the
Yes fair point, but when it's a empty list and new elements are replaced
with a new list instance it's fine, especially as [[]]*10 is
significantly faster than [[] for i in xrange(10)] as I was previously
doing.
In fact I think that's partly answered my question [[]]*x must create a list
o
Hi,
Don't remember that you are using the same list in each element of the
outer list. If you don't want this, use [[] for i in range(5)]. I
don't think there is another way in C either (or too complicated).
Matthieu
2009/1/26 Hanni Ali :
> Hi,
>
> Quick question, I've been doing a fair bit of e
